|
The Household Cleaning Products Market
Packaged Facts - Sep 1, 1999 - ID: LA549
URL: http://www.packagedfacts.com/Household-Cleaning-Products-112838/
Online Download - $2,750.00
Abstract
This report analyzes the $4 billion U.S. market for household cleaning products—a mature market looking to shake itself out of growth doldrums by emphasizing anti-bacterial products, green or environmentally friendly packaging and formulations, and new or natural fragrances. The report offers in-depth coverage of market size for surface cleaners and specialty cleaners, including projections through 2003, sales-tracking data on marketer and brand shares, an analysis of marketer strategies and retail dynamics and a full presentation of consumer data on purchasing preferences and usage patterns. Individual sections are available.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
Scope and Methodology
- Market Scope
- Report Methodology
The Products
- Six Segments in Surface Cleaners Category
- All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants
- Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- Scouring Pads/Sponges
- Glass Cleaners/Ammonia
- Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- Floor Cleaners/Waxes
- Six Segments in Specialty Cleaners Category
- Rug/Upholstery Cleaners
- Toilet Bowl Cleaners
- Drain Openers
- Spray Disinfectants
- Oven Cleaners
- Metal Polishes
The Market
- Mass-Market Sales Approach $3.4 Billion in 1998
- Surface Cleaner Sales at $2.0 Billion
- Specialty Cleaner Sales at $1.4 Billion
- Table 1-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales by Product Category, 1994-2003 (dollars): Surface Cleaners, Specialty Cleaners
- Surface Cleaners Claim 59% of Market
- Household Cleaners a Mature Market
- Market Projected to Surpass $3.9 Billion in 2003
The Marketers
- Over 50 Notable Household Cleaners Marketers
- Clorox Claims 22% of Market
- Figure 1-1: Top Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners, 1998 (percent): Clorox, Reckitt & Colman, S.C. Johnson, Procter & Gamble, All Others
- Surface Cleaner Leaders
- Specialty Cleaner Leaders
- The Reckitt Benckiser Challenge
Distribution and Retail
- Range of Outlets
- Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Market
- Supermarkets, Drugstores Slipping in Dollar Sales
- Supermarkets Account for Two-Thirds of Retail Overall
The Consumer
- Basic Patterns for Surface Cleaners
- Basic Patterns for Specialty Cleaners
II. The Overall Market
The Products
- Two Market Categories
- Six Segments in Surface Cleaners Category
- All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants
- Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- Scouring Pads/Sponges
- Glass Cleaners/Ammonia
- Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- Floor Cleaners/Waxes
- Considerable Cross-Use Among Surface Cleaners
- Six Segments in Specialty Cleaners Category
- Rug/Upholstery Cleaners
- Toilet Bowl Cleaners
- Drain Openers
- Spray Disinfectants
- Oven Cleaners
- Metal Polishes
- Government Regulation
- FIFRA Eases Rules in Mid-1990s
- Figure 2-1: U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
The Market
- Mass-Market Sales Approach $3.4 Billion in 1998
- Surface Cleaner Sales at $2.0 Billion
- Table 2-1: U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners by Product Category: Surface Cleaners vs. Specialty Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
- Specialty Cleaner Sales at $1.4 Billion
- Surface Cleaners Claim 59% of Market
- Figure 2-2: Share of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners by Product Category: Surface Cleaners vs. Specialty Cleaners, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent)
- Household Cleaners a Mature Market
- Convenience vs. Conscience
- Growth in Households
- Table 2-2: Number of U.S. Households, 1990-2010
- Less Time to Clean
- Broader Use Only a Partial Fix
- The Role of Niche Marketing
- The Case Against Chemicals
- Market Projected to Surpass $3.9 Billion in 2003
- Table 2-3: Projected U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners by Product Category: Surface Cleaners vs. Specialty Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
The Marketers
- Over 50 Notable Household Cleaners Marketers
- Clorox Claims 22% of Market
- Table 2-4: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 6 Marketers, Private Label, All Other Marketers
- Table 2-5: Leading U.S. Household Cleaners Marketers by Brands and Product Categories (59 Marketers and Their Brands)
Competitive Profile: Clorox Co.
- Bleach and More
- Company History
- Acquisition of First Brands
- Brand Building and Acquisitions
- Attention to Details
Competitive Profile: Reckitt & Colman
- Keeping Households Clean and Healthy
- Company History
- Filling In More Gaps
- Committing to China
- Navigating in Troubled Waters
- Competing in America
- Reckitt Benckiser
Competitive Profile: S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
- A Big Family Business
- Company History
- Johnson in the 1990s: Active in Acquisitions
- Growth Through Innovation
Competitive Profile: Procter & Gamble Co.
- P&G Has Both Size and Diversity
- Company History
- New Strategies for the Nineties
- Safety and Testing
- P&G and Yahoo!
- Concentrated Versions
Competitive Briefs
- Benckiser Consumer Products
- Clean Shower L.P.
- Faultless Starch/Bon Ami Co.
- Iron Out, Inc.
- Lime-O-Sol
- Servaas Labs, Inc.
- Spontex, Inc.
- 3M
- J.A. Wright & Co.
Distribution and Retail
- Range of Outlets
- Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Market
- Table 2-6: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector and Product Category, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 3 Sectors, 2 Categories
- Supermarkets, Drugstores Slipping in Dollar Sales
- Supermarkets Account for Two-Thirds of Retail Overall
The Consumer
- Basic Consumer Patterns for Surface Cleaners
- Table 2-7: Consumer Overview for Household Surface Cleaners by Product Type, 1998 (percent): 4 Product Classifications
- Basic Consumer Patterns for Specialty Cleaners
- Table 2-8: Consumer Overview for Household Specialty Cleaners by Product Type, 1998 (% Principal Shoppers, Median Age, Median Household Income)
III. Surface Cleaners
The Products
- Six Segments in Surface Cleaners Category
- All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants
- Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- Scouring Pads/Sponges
- Glass Cleaners/Ammonia
- Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- Floor Cleaners/Waxes
- Considerable Cross-Use Among Surface Cleaners
- Figure 3-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
Market Size and Growth
- Sales Approach $2 Billion in 1998
- Table 3-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
- All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants Return to Growth
- Non-Abrasives Make 27% Jump
- A Slow-Down in Scouring-Pad Gains
- Glass Cleaners/Ammonia Gain Momentum
- Abrasives Continue in Decline
- Floor Cleaner Sales Are Stagnant
- Table 3-2a: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners by Product Segment, 1994-1998 (dollars): All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants; Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners; Scouring Pads/Sponges
- Table 3-2b: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners by Product Segment, 1994-1998 (dollars): Glass Cleaners/Ammonia; Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners; Floor Cleaners/Waxes
Market Composition
- All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants Claim One-Third of Category
- Figure 3-2: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Surface Cleaner Sales by Product Segment, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 6 Product Segments
- Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Market
- Figure 3-3: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Surface Cleaner Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): Supermarkets, Mass Merchandisers, Drugstores
- Only Floor Cleaners Show Regional Skew
- Table 3-3: Usage by U.S. Region of Selected Household Cleaner Types, 1998 (indices): 5 Product Classifications/6 U.S. Regions
Factors to Market Growth
- Broad Applications Suit Busy Lifestyles
- Niche-Marketing Stimulates Sales
- Steady Stream of Innovation
- All-Purpose Disinfectants Benefit Most from FIFRA
- Shower Cleaners Resurrect Non-Abrasives Segment
- Scouring Pads/Sponges a Mature Segment
- Glass Cleaners Tap Potential in Combination Products
- Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners Revert to Commodity Status
- Floor Cleaners/Waxes Rocked by New Flooring Trends
- Figure 3-4: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
Projected Market Growth
- Surface Cleaners to Show Moderate Growth
- Table 3-4: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
- Growth by Segment
- Table 3-5a: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners by Product Segment, 1998-2003 (dollars): All-PurposeCleaners/Disinfectants; Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners; Scouring Pads/Sponges
- Table 3-5b: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners by Product Segment, 1998-2003 (dollars): Glass Cleaners/Ammonia; Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners; Floor Cleaners/Waxes
The Marketers
- 36 Notable Mass Marketers
- Table 3-6: Number of Major Household Surface Cleaners Marketers by Product Segment, 1998 (number): 6 Product Segments
- More Brands Than Marketers
- Table 3-7: Leading U.S. Household Surface Cleaners Marketers by Brands and Product Segments (37 Marketers and Their Brands)
Marketer and Brand Shares
- Clorox at 42% Share in All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants
- Clorox Garners 26% of Non-Abrasives
- 3M Claims One-Third Share of Scouring Pads/Sponges
- S.C. Johnson Racks Up 58% of Glass Cleaner/Ammonia Sales
- Clorox and P&G Dominate in Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- S.C. Johnson Corners 57% of Floor Cleaner Sales
- Table 3-8: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants, 1998 (percent): 7 Marketers/19 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 3-9: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 8 Marketers/13 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 3-10: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Scouring Pads/Sponges, 1998 (percent): 7 Marketers/17 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 3-11: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Glass Cleaners/Ammonia, 1998 (percent): 5 Marketers/7 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 3-12: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 4 Marketers/4 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 3-13: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Floor Cleaners/Waxes, 1998 (percent): 5 Marketers/13 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
The Competitive Situation
- Clorox and S.C. Johnson Form the First Tier
- The Reckitt Benckiser Challenge
- An Onslaught of New Product Activity
Marketing and New Product Trends
- Reformulations to Increase Potency
- Germ-Killing Surface Cleaners
- Cleaners with Bleach
- "Safer" Products
- Citrus-Based Alternatives
- New Scents Make Sense
- New Sizes and Packagings
- Table 3-14: Selected Household Surface Cleaner New Product Introductions, 1998 - Summer 1999
Consumer Advertising and Promotion
- Ad Spending Exceeds $157 Million in 1998
- Clorox Allots $55 Million
- S.C. Johnson Second with $36 Million
- Third-Tier Marketers Hover Around $20 Million
- Ads Focus on Effectiveness and Power
- Strong but Safe
- Germ-Killing Properties
- Atmospheric Scents
- Misting Away Shower Care
- Keeping Floors Clean and Beautiful
- Combination Copy
- Coupons Remain Common
- A Rebate/Lottery
- Samples of Consumer Advertising
Trade Advertising and Promotion
- Products on Parade
- Standard Approaches to Promotion¾Plus Sampling
Distribution and Retail
- Distributors vs. Direct Distribution
- Warehousing vs. Direct Store Delivery
- Advantages of Warehouse Delivery
- Disadvantages of Warehouse Delivery
- Advantages of Direct Store Delivery
- Disadvantages of Direct Store Delivery
- ECR and Category Management
- Range of Outlets
- Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Category
- Table 3-15: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Surface Cleaner Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector and Product Segment, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 3 Sectors, 6 Segments
- Supermarkets, Drugstores Slipping in Dollar Sales
- Supermarkets Account for Two-Thirds of Retail Overall
- Retail Margins at 25%-34%
Consumer Overview: Surface Cleaners
- Note on Simmons Market Research Bureau Data
- Range of Data
- Basic Consumer Patterns
- Table 3-16: Consumer Overview for Household Surface Cleaners by Product Type, 1998 (percent): 4 Product Classifications, Entire Sample
Consumer Focus: Scouring Pads/Sponges
- 96 Million Purchasers of Scouring Pads/Sponges
- Income and Education Are Indicators by Product Type
- Indicators by Brand Preference
- Table 3-17: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Scouring Pads/Sponges by Product Type: Non-Steel Wool vs. Steel Wool, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 3-18: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Scouring Pads/Sponges by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): S.O.S, Brillo, Scotch Brite
Consumer Focus: Window/Glass Cleaners
- 106 Million Purchasers of Window/Glass Cleaners
- Use on Glass, Non-Glass, or Both
- Distinct Demographics for Non-Glass Users
- Broad Draw for Windex
- Table 3-19: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Window/Glass Cleaners by Surface Type, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Glass, Non-Glass, Both
- Table 3-20: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Window/Glass Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Glass Plus, Ajax, Formula 409
Consumer Focus: Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- 88 Million Purchasers of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
- Liquids and Gels Draw Up-Market Users
- Little Consumer Differentiation to Kitchen vs. Bathroom Use
- Demographics by Brand
- Table 3-21: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners by Product Type, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Powder, Liquid, Gel
- Table 3-22: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners by Place Most Often Used: Bathroom vs. Kitchen, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 3-23: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Comet, Ajax, Soft Scrub
Consumer Focus: Floor Cleaners/Waxes
- 33 Million Purchasers of Floor Cleaners/Waxes
- Demographic Indicators
- Younger Profile for Cleans & Waxes Products
- Mop & Glo vs. Second-Tier Brands
- Table 3-24: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Floor Waxes/Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 3-25: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Floor Waxes/Cleaners by Product Type: Cleans & Waxes vs. Waxes Only, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 3-26: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Mop & Glo Brand Floor Waxes/Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 3-27: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Floor Waxes/Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Future, Armstrong (any), Brite
IV. Specialty Cleaners
The Products
- Six Segments in Specialty Cleaner Category
- Rug/Upholstery Cleaners
- Toilet Bowl Cleaners
- Drain Openers
- Spray Disinfectants
- Oven Cleaners
- Metal Polishes
- Figure 4-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
Market Size and Growth
- Specialty Cleaner Sales Approach $1.4 Billion
- Table 4-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
- Rug Cleaners Surge to $526 Million
- Toilet Bowl Cleaners Edge Up to $387 Million
- Drain Openers Slip to $183 Million
- Spray Disinfectants, at $166 Million, Reverse Decline
- Oven Cleaners Hold Constant at $64 Million
- Metal Polishes Rise to $52 Million
- Table 4-2a: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners by Product Segment, 1994-1998 (dollars): Rug/Upholstery Cleaners, Toilet Bowl Cleaners, Drain Openers
- Table 4-2b: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners by Product Segment, 1994-1998 (dollars): Spray Disinfectants, Oven Cleaners, Metal Polishes
Market Composition
- Rug Cleaners Remain Best-Selling Specialty Cleaner
- Figure 4-2: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Specialty Cleaner Sales by Product Segment, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 6 Product Segments
- Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Market
- Figure 4-3: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Specialty Cleaner Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): Supermarkets, Mass Merchandisers, Drugstores
- Sales by Region
- Table 4-3: Usage by U.S. Region of Selected Household Specialty Cleaner Types, 1998 (indices): 6 Product Segments/6 U.S. Regions
Factors to Market Growth
- Growth Potential Limited by Lifestyle Factors
- Rug Cleaners See Promise in Pet Population, Chemical Guards
- Toilet Bowl Cleaners to Rely on Convenience, Strength
- Drain Openers Suffer from Ultra-Efficiency
- FIFRA Amendment Means Opportunity for Spray Disinfectants
- Oven Cleaners Hurt by Microwave and Self-Cleaning Ovens
- Metal Polishes Have Rough Road Ahead
- Figure 4-4: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
Projected Market Growth
- Sales Gains Projected at 2.7%-4.0%
- Table 4-4: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
- Growth by Segment
- Table 4-5a: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners by Product Segment, 1998-2003 (dollars): Rug/Upholstery Cleaners, Toilet Bowl Cleaners, Spray Disinfectants
- Table 4-5b: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners by Product Segment, 1998-2003 (dollars): Drain Openers, Oven Cleaners, Metal Polishes
The Marketers
- 21 Notable Mass Marketers
- Table 4-6: Number of Major Household Specialty Cleaner Marketers by Product Segment, 1998 (number): 6 Product Segments
- Brands Outnumber Marketers
- Table 4-7: Leading U.S. Household Specialty Cleaner Marketers by Brands and Product Segments (37 Marketers and Their Brands)
Marketer and Brand Shares
- Reckitt & Colman Claims 18% of Rug Cleaner Segment
- Reckitt & Colman at 29% Share of Toilet Bowl Cleaners
- Clorox and S.C. Johnson Lead Drain Opener Segment
- Reckitt & Colman Monopolizes Spray Disinfectants
- Reckitt & Colman Racks Up 61% of Oven Cleaner Sales
- Wright Claims One-Fifth of Metal Polish Segment
- Table 4-8: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Rug/Upholstery Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 7 Marketers/15 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 4-9: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Toilet Bowl Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 5 Marketers/14 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 4-10: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Drain Openers, 1998 (percent): 2 Marketers/3 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 4-11: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Spray Disinfectants, 1998 (percent): Reckitt & Colman/Lysol, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 4-12: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Oven Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 2 Marketers/3 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
- Table 4-13: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Metal Polishes, 1998 (percent): 4 Marketers/6 Brands, All Other Marketers
The Competitive Situation
- Reckitt Dominates Market and Brand Leadership
- The Catch-22 of New-Improved Products
- Reformulations Are Primary "New" Product Activity
Marketing and New Product Trends
- Larger Segments Show More Innovation
- "Professional Strength" Products
- Convenience in Performance and Packaging
- Getting Down to Germs
- Fragrance Doesn't Necessarily Follow Function
- All-Natural Specialty Cleaners
- Table 4-14: Selected Household Specialty Cleaner New Product Introductions, 1998-Summer 1999
Consumer Advertising and Promotion
- Over $140 Million in 1998 Advertising
- Four Marketers Dominate Advertising
- Febreze Gives Specialty Cleaners Parity in Media Spending
- The Effectiveness/Power Appeal
- More and Better
- The Varieties of Convenience
- Putting a Number On It
- Products Over Plumbers
- Coupons Remain Most Popular Specialty Cleaners Promotion
- Extra Product Offered Free
- Samples of Consumer Advertising
Trade Advertising and Promotion
- Products on Parade
- Standard Approaches to Promotion¾Plus Sampling
Distribution and Retail
- Distributors vs. Direct Distribution
- Warehousing vs. Direct Store Delivery
- Advantages of Warehouse Delivery
- Disadvantages of Warehouse Delivery
- Advantages of Direct Store Delivery
- Disadvantages of Direct Store Delivery
- ECR and Category Management
- Range of Outlets
- Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Category
- Table 4-15: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Specialty Cleaner Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector and Product Segment, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 3 Sectors, 6 Segments
- Supermarkets, Drugstores Slipping in Dollar Sales
- Supermarkets Account for Two-Thirds of Retail Overall
- Retail Margins at 23%-31%
Consumer Overview: Specialty Cleaners
- Note on Simmons Market Research Bureau Data
- Range of Data
- Basic Consumer Patterns
- Table 4-16: Consumer Overview for Household Specialty Cleaner Products by Product Type, 1998 (percent): 6 Product Classifications, Entire Sample
Consumer Focus: Rug Cleaners
- Nearly 45% of American Principal Shoppers Use Rug Cleaners
- Middle-Income Middle-Agers Are Typical Users
- Liquid vs. Aerosol vs. Granules
- Resolve Preferred by Educated, Professional Women
- Rug Deodorizers/Fresheners Almost as Popular
- Race and Income Are Consistent Brand Indicators
- Table 4-17: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Cleaners/Shampoos, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-18: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Cleaners/Shampoos by Product Type, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Liquid, Aerosol, Powder/Granules
- Table 4-19: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Cleaners/Shampoos by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Resolve, Woolite, Scotchgard
- Table 4-20: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Deodorizers/Fresheners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-21: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Deodorizers/Fresheners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Arm & Hammer, Love My Carpet, Glade
Consumer Focus: Toilet Bowl Cleaners
- 56% Use In-Bowl Toilet Cleaners
- 50% Use In-Tank Cleaners
- Table 4-22: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Bowl Toilet Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-23: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Bowl Toilet Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Lysol, Vanish, Toilet Duck
- Table 4-24: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Tank Toilet Bowl Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-25a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Tank Toilet Bowl Cleaners by Brand: Vanish vs. 2000 Flushes, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-25b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Tank Toilet Bowl Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Clorox Bleach Tabs, Ty-D-Bol, Sani-Flush
Consumer Focus: Drain Openers
- 48% of Principal Shoppers Use Drain Openers
- Liquid vs. Aerosol vs. Crystal
- Drano vs. Liquid Plumr
- Table 4-26: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Drain Openers, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-27: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Drain Openers by Type, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Liquid, Crystal, Aerosol
- Table 4-28: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Drain Openers by Brand: Drano vs. Liquid Plumr, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
Consumer Focus: Oven Cleaners
- Over 40% of Principal Shoppers Use Oven Cleaner
- Demographics by Brand
- Table 4-29: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Oven Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-30a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Oven Cleaners by Brand: Easy Off vs. S.O.S., 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-30b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Oven Cleaners by Brand: Dow vs. Arm & Hammer, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
Consumer Focus: Metal Polishes
- Higher Economic Status Is Key Indicator
- 16% Use Silver Polish
- Demographics by Brand
- Table 4-31: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Metal Polishes/Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-32a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Metal Polishes/Cleaners by Type: Silver/Silverplate vs. Brass, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-32b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Metal Polishes/Cleaners by Type: Copper vs. Aluminum, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
- Table 4-33: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Metal Polishes/Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Brasso, Wright's, Twinkle
Appendix I: Examples of Consumer Advertising and Promotions
Appendix II: Addresses of Selected Marketers
Buy Buy the Section
 |  |  | SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY (pg. 13) |
 |  |  | THE PRODUCTS (pp. 14 - 16) |
 |  |  | THE MARKETERS (pp. 19 - 21) |
 |  |  | DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL (pp. 22 - 23) |
 |  |  | THE PRODUCTS (pp. 27 - 31) |
 |  |  | THE MARKETERS (pp. 38 - 46) |
 |  |  | COMPETITIVE PROFILE: CLOROX CO. (pp. 47 - 50) |
 |  |  | COMPETITIVE PROFILE: RECKITT & COLMAN (pp. 51 - 55) |
 |  |  | COMPETITIVE PROFILE: S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC. (pp. 56 - 59) |
 |  |  | COMPETITIVE PROFILE: PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. (pp. 60 - 63) |
 |  |  | COMPETITIVE BRIEFS (pp. 64 - 73) |
 |  |  | DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL (pp. 74 - 75) |
 |  |  | THE CONSUMER (pp. 76 - 78) |
 |  |  | THE PRODUCTS (pp. 81 - 83) |
 |  |  | MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH (pp. 84 - 86) |
 |  |  | MARKET COMPOSITION (pp. 87 - 89) |
 |  |  | FACTORS TO MARKET GROWTH (pp. 90 - 95) |
 |  |  | PROJECTED MARKET GROWTH (pp. 96 - 97) |
 |  |  | THE MARKETERS (pp. 98 - 104) |
 |  |  | MARKETER AND BRAND SHARES (pp. 105 - 113) |
 |  |  | THE COMPETITIVE SITUATION (pp. 114 - 115) |
 |  |  | MARKETING AND NEW PRODUCT TRENDS (pp. 116 - 124) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION (pp. 125 - 130) |
 |  |  | TRADE ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION (pg. 131) |
 |  |  | DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL (pp. 132 - 137) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER OVERVIEW: SURFACE CLEANERS (pp. 138 - 139) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: SCOURING PADS/SPONGES (pp. 140 - 143) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: WINDOW/GLASS CLEANERS (pp. 144 - 146) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: ABRASIVE TUB/TILE CLEANERS (pp. 147 - 151) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: FLOOR CLEANERS/WAXES (pp. 152 - 156) |
 |  |  | THE PRODUCTS (pp. 159 - 161) |
 |  |  | MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH (pp. 162 - 164) |
 |  |  | MARKET COMPOSITION (pp. 165 - 167) |
 |  |  | FACTORS TO MARKET GROWTH (pp. 168 - 172) |
 |  |  | PROJECTED MARKET GROWTH (pp. 173 - 174) |
 |  |  | THE MARKETERS (pp. 175 - 181) |
 |  |  | MARKETER AND BRAND SHARES (pp. 182 - 188) |
 |  |  | THE COMPETITIVE SITUATION (pp. 189 - 190) |
 |  |  | MARKETING AND NEW PRODUCT TRENDS (pp. 191 - 198) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION (pp. 199 - 202) |
 |  |  | TRADE ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION (pg. 203) |
 |  |  | DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL (pp. 204 - 209) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER OVERVIEW: SPECIALTY CLEANERS (pp. 210 - 212) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: RUG CLEANERS (pp. 213 - 219) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: TOILET BOWL CLEANERS (pp. 220 - 225) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: DRAIN OPENERS (pp. 226 - 229) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: OVEN CLEANERS (pp. 230 - 233) |
 |  |  | CONSUMER FOCUS: METAL POLISHES (pp. 234 - 240) |
|