The U.S. Market for Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods

Dec 1, 1998
199 Pages - Pub ID: LA528
Abstract Table of Contents Search Inside Report Buy By the Section Related Reports

I. Executive Summary

    The Products
  • Four Product Categories
  • Artificially Sweetened Products Are Core of Market
  • Products with No Sugar Added
  • Reduced-Sugar Products
  • Dietetic Foods
  • The Artificial Sweeteners
    The Market
  • Retail Sales at $6.3 Billion in 1998
  • Artificially Sweetened Captures Three-Fourths of Market
  • Major Product Segments Are Mature
  • Health Trend Continues as Americans "Bust" Sugar
  • Diabetic Population Increasing
  • New Sweetener Development
  • New Product Development
  • Retail Sales to Approach $8 Billion in 2003
  • Table 1-1: U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods by Product Category, 1994-2003 (dollars): 4 Product Categories
    The Marketers
  • Three Levels of Marketers
  • Industry Becoming More Sophisticated
  • Diet Soft Drinks Claim 75% of Artificial Sweetener Market
  • Coke Captures Over 30% of Mass Market
  • New Artificial Sweeteners Enter Market
  • Best Is Yet to Come
  • The Case for Nutritive Sweeteners
  • Dietetic Becoming More Mainstream
  • Mainstream Expenditures by Major Marketers
    Distribution and Retail
  • Distribution Follows Standard Channels
  • The Role of Distributors
  • Distributors vs. Direct Distribution
  • Warehousing vs. Direct Store Delivery
  • The Mass-Market Landscape
  • Supermarkets Expand Selection
  • Most Sugar-Altered Foods Priced at Parity
  • Private-Label Lineups Increasing
    The Consumer
  • Consumer Round Up
  • Figure 1-1: U.S. Consumer Overview by Selected Artificially Sweetened Products, 1998 (percent): 5 Products
  • 43% Use Diet Carbonated Sodas
  • Mott's, Apple & Eve, and Welch's in 100% Juices
  • Care*Free vs. Trident and Extra
  • 13% Use All-Fruit Jams, Jellies, and Preserves
  • Sugar-Free Jell-O vs. Royal
  • Dannon Light vs. Yoplait Lite
    Scope and Methodology
  • Market Parameters
  • Report Methodology

II. The Product

    Scope of Report
  • Sugar-Altered Foods and Beverages Sold at Mass Market
  • Sugar-Free, No-Sugar-Added, Reduced-Sugar, and Dietetic
  • Variety of Products
    History of the Market
  • Saccharin the First Sugar Substitute
  • From Cyclamate to Tab
  • Regulatory War Continues
  • Congress Sides with Consumers
  • Aspartame Arrives on the Scene
  • Efforts to Delist Saccharin
  • Aspartame Also Subject to Study
  • Sucralose Pushes Past Regulators
  • Ace-K Approved for Use in 1998
  • Sugar-Free Foods Have Staying Power
  • New Diet Trend Focuses on Sugar Reduction
  • Fifty Ways to Hold the Sugar
    Product Definition and Categories
  • Four Product Categories
  • Artificially Sweetened Products Are Core of Market
  • Products with No Sugar Added Are Naturally Sweet or Alternatively Sweetened
  • Reduced-Sugar Products Appeal to Dieters
  • Dietetic Foods Round Out Options
    The Sweeteners
  • Saccharin the First Artificial Sweetener
  • Aspartame the Current Standard
  • Sucralose Heads Next Generation
  • PepsiCo Banks on Ace-K
  • Neotame in the Wings
  • Lactose and Fructose Sweeten Naturally
  • Natural Stevia Sweeteners Enhance Flavors
  • Sorbitol, Mannitol, and Xylitol
  • Increased Production of Lacitol
  • Erythritol Enters U.S. Market
  • Maltitol Gives Hope to Sugar-Free Chocolate
  • African Berries the Next Sugar Substitute?
    Packaging and Labeling
  • Sugar Content Specified
  • Warning Labels for Saccharin
  • Advisory Labels for Aspartame
  • General Health Positioning
  • Red and White Swirl Disappearing

III. The Market
Figure 3-1: Estimated U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods, 1994-1998 (dollars)

    Market Size and Growth
  • Methodology of Sales Estimates
  • Retail Sales at $6.3 Billion in 1998
  • Table 3-1: Estimated U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods, 1994-1998 (dollars)
  • Artificially Sweetened at $4.7 Billion
  • No-Sugar-Added Category Regains Momentum
  • Reduced-Sugar Category Is Stagnant
  • Growth Spurt in Dietetic Category
  • Table 3-2: Estimated U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods by Product Category, 1994-1998 (dollars): Artificially Sweetened Products; No-Sugar-Added/Naturally Sweet or Alternatively Sweetened Products; Reduced-Sugar Products; Dietetic Products, Artificially and/or Alternatively Sweetened
    Market Composition
  • Artificially Sweetened Captures Three-Fourths of Market
  • Figure 3-2: U.S. Mass Market for Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods: Share of Dollar Sales by Product Category, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 4 Categories
  • Food Stores Account for 78% of Mass Market
  • Figure 3-3: The U.S. Market for Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods: Mass-Market Shares by Retailer Type, 1998 (percent): Food Stores, Mass Merchandisers, Drugstores
  • Market Composition Varies Regionally
  • Table 3-3: Regional Distribution of Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Food Purchasers by Product Type, 1998 (number and percent): 12 Factors
    Factors to Market Growth
  • Major Product Segments Are Mature
  • Health Trend Continues as Americans "Bust" Sugar
  • Diabetic Population Increasing
  • Research Reveals Additional Health Attributes for Products
  • New Sweetener Development
  • New Product Development
  • Still Sunny Skies for Sugar
  • Downsides of Sugar Substitutes
  • Figure 3-4: Projected U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods by Product Category, 1998-2003 (dollars)
    Projected Market Growth
  • Retail Sales to Approach $8 Billion in 2003
  • Table 3-4: Projected U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods, 1998-2003 (dollars)
  • Artificially Sweetened to Stabilize at 4% Growth
  • No-Sugar-Added Category to Accelerate to $2 Billion
  • Table 3-5: Projected U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods by Product Category, 1998-2003 (dollars): Artificially Sweetened Products; No-Sugar-Added/Naturally Sweet or Alternatively Sweetened Products; Reduced-Sugar Products; Dietetic Products, Artificially and/or Alternatively Sweetened Products
  • Limited Prospects for Reduced-Sugar Sales
  • Dietetic Sales Spawn Mainstream Competition
    Marketer Overview
  • Several Hundred Companies in the Field
  • Three Levels of Marketers
  • The Major Mainstream Marketers
  • Dietetic and Specialty Marketers
  • Table 4-1: The U.S. Market for Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Products: Selected Mass Marketers by Brand Line, Product, and Category
    The Competitive Situation
  • Industry Becoming More Sophisticated
  • Diet Soft Drinks Claim 75% of Artificial Sweetener Market
  • Coke Captures Over One-Quarter of Mass Market
  • No-Sugar-Added Is Up and Coming
  • Ocean Spray Challenged in 100% Juice Segment
  • Minute Maid vs. Tropicana in Refrigerated Juices, Frozen Concentrates
  • No-Sugar-Added vs. Artificially Sweetened in Bottled Single-Serve Juices
  • Kraft in Control in Drink Mixes
  • Del Monte and Tri Valley Compete in Canned Fruit
  • Smucker Is King in Jams, Jellies, and Spreads
  • Mainstream and Specialty Sugar-Altered Syrups
  • Crowded Field in Candy, Gum, and Cookies
  • Ice Cream and Novelties Headed by Dreyer's
  • Dannon Leads in Yogurt
  • Mainstreamers Spin Their Lines
  • Prices Aligned with Regular Brands'
  • Competition Played Out in New Product Releases
  • Growth of Private Label
    Competitive Profile: Coca-Cola Co
  • Company Overview
  • No Plans for Ace-K
  • Recent Advertising Campaigns Shift Focus
  • What's New in the 90s
  • Recent Developments
  • Litigation Woes
  • Coca-Cola Enterprises Expands in New York and Canada
  • Minute Maid Co.
    Competitive Profile: Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
  • Company Overview
  • History of the Company
  • First to Market Light Ice Cream
  • Competing in the Sugar-Free Arena
  • But How Does it Taste?
    Competitive Profile: Hain Food Group, Inc
  • Company Overview
  • Company History
  • Brands not Buildings
  • Labels and Alliances
  • Rice Cakes and Acquisitions
  • Estee Line Continues to Expand
    Competitive Profile: Nabisco Holdings Corp.
    (RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp.)
  • Company Overview
  • Reorganization Efforts
  • A Sugar-Free Push
    Competitive Profile: Nestlé USA, Inc. (Nestlé S.A.)
  • Company Overview
  • From Infant Food to World Leader
  • The Past Two Decades
  • 1997 a Year for Change
  • New Packaging for Quik
    Competitive Profile: Northland Cranberries, Inc
  • Company Overview
  • Company History
  • Recent Purchases
  • Introducing a 100% Juice Line
  • A Company that Does it All
  • The Northland and Ocean Spray Battle
    Competitive Profile: PepsiCo, Inc.
  • Company Overview
  • Company History
  • Competitive Maneuvers Against Coca-Cola
  • Pepsi One Is First Soft Drink with Ace K
  • Advertising Campaigns Target Youth
  • Keeping New Products Coming
  • Pepsi Acquires Tropicana Products
  • The Tropicana Lineup
    Competitive Profile: Philip Morris Cos., Inc./ Kraft Foods, Inc.
  • Company Overview
  • Emergence as a Leader
  • Brand Recognition
  • Brands Competing in Sugar-Free Arena
  • New Line for Crystal Light
    Competitive Profile: J.M. Smucker Co
  • Company Overview
  • Smucker Sees Importance of Health-Conscious Brands
  • Smucker a Brand Innovator in Reduced Sugar
  • Acquisitions Lead to Worldwide Growth
    Competitive Profile: Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co
  • Company Overview
  • Advertising Pays Off for First Wrigley
  • Begrudging Entry Into Sugar-Free
  • Competition Leads to Worldwide Expansion
  • Market Leader in Sugar-Free
  • Future Looks Bright for Wrigley
    Marketing and New Product Trends
  • New Artificial Sweeteners Enter Market
  • Best Is Yet to Come
  • Beyond Diet
  • The Case for Nutritive Sweeteners
  • Dietetic Becoming More Mainstream
  • Wider Product Range
  • Line Extensions in New Flavors
  • Size Matters
  • Putting it in Plastic
  • More Juice, More Exotic
  • An Organic Trend
  • Table 4-2: The U.S. Market for Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods: Selected New Product Introductions, 1997-1998
    Consumer Advertising and Promotion
  • Promotion vs. Piggyback Sales
  • TV Spots Used Most Often
  • The Radio and Print Alternatives
  • Mainstream Expenditures by Major Marketers
  • Diet Coke and Looking Good
  • For Pepsi, Taste Is It
  • Naturally Good
  • Copy-Intensive Advertising
  • Celebrity Advertising
  • Corporate Citizenship
  • Convenience at the Core
  • Taking a Shot at Competitors
  • Coupons Most Popular Promotion Tool
  • Consumer Information
  • The Internet Connection
  • Giveaways and Rebates
  • Not for Kids and "Win Nothing" Sweepstakes
  • Sports Sponsorships
  • Environmental Efforts
  • Samples of Consumer Advertising and Promotion
    Trade Advertising and Promotion
  • Products on Parade
  • Most Promotions Are Standard
  • The Role of Trade Shows

V. Distribution And Retail

    At the Distribution Level
  • Distribution Follows Standard Channels
  • Regional Distribution
  • Apple & Eve Goes West
  • The Role of Distributors
  • Cola and UnCola Lineups
  • Distributors vs. Direct Distribution
  • Northland Goes from "Marsh to Market"
  • Maintaining the Cold Chain
  • Warehousing vs. Direct Store Delivery
  • Advantages of Warehouse Delivery
  • Disadvantages of Warehouse Delivery
  • Advantages of Direct Store Delivery
  • Disadvantages of Direct Store Delivery
  • Smaller Marketers Frequently Work Through Brokers
    At the Retail Level
  • The Mass-Market Landscape
  • Figure 5-1: U.S. Market for Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods: Mass-Market Shares by Retailer Type, 1998 (percent): Food Stores, Mass Merchandisers, Drugstores
  • Supermarkets Expand Selection
  • TheSugar Busters! Effect
  • Mass Merchandisers Weigh In
  • The Cross-Promotion Option
  • Driving up Drugstore Sales
  • Leveraging the Healthcare Focus
  • Securing the Spontaneous Sale
  • New Products for Nonfood Outlets
  • Most Sugar-Altered Foods Priced at Parity
  • Price Promotions
  • Merchandising Strategies for Sugar-Altered Products
  • The Claim on Shelf Space
  • A Crossroads for Dietetic Sections
  • Integrating Sugar-Free Candy
  • In and Out of Bulk Bins
  • Hard Choices in Soft Drinks
  • Coke and Pepsi Make It Tough for the Rest
  • Schweppes' Freedom of Choice—And Alliance
  • Point-of-Purchase Support
  • Private-Label Lineups Increasing

VI. The Consumer

    Consumer Overview
  • Notes on Simmons Market Research Bureau Data
  • Simmons Data on Sugar-Altered Foods
  • Market Round Up
  • Table 6-1: The Market for Sugar-Substitute and Low-Sugar Foods: User Overview by Selected Product Type/Brand, 1998 (percent): 33 Product Types/Brands
    Consumer Use by Product Type
  • 43% Use Diet Carbonated Sodas
  • Crystal Light vs. Country Time and Kool-Aid
  • Lipton vs. Nestea in Diet Iced Tea Mix
  • Under 3% Use Sugar-Free Instant Coffee Mix
  • Mott's, Apple & Eve, and Welch's in 100% Juices
  • Care*Free vs. Trident and Extra
  • BreathSavers vs. Certs
  • 13% Use All-Fruit Jams, Jellies, and Preserves
  • Sugar-Free Jell-O vs. Royal
  • Dannon Light vs. Yoplait Lite
  • Table 6-2a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Diet Carbonated Soft Drinks, 1998 (U.S. Adults)
  • Table 6-2b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Diet Carbonated Soft Drinks by Brand Lines, 1998 (U.S. Adults): Diet Coke Products, Diet Pepsi Products, Other Diet Soda Brands
  • Table 6-3: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Artificially Sweetened Soft Drink Mix by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Adults): Crystal Light Low-Calorie, Country Time Lemonade, Sugar-Free Kool-Aid
  • Table 6-4a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Artificially Sweetened Diet Instant Iced Tea Mix, 1998 (U.S. Adults)
  • Table 6-4b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Artificially Sweetened Diet Iced Tea Mix by Brand: Lipton vs. Nestea, 1998 (U.S. Adults)
  • Table 6-5: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Sugar-Free Flavored Instant Coffee Mix, 1998 (U.S. Adults)
  • Table 6-6: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of 100% Juice/No-Sugar-Added Fruit Juices by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Adults): Mott's, Apple & Eve, Welch's
  • Table 6-7a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Sugar-Free Gum, 1998 (U.S. Adults)
  • Table 6-7b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Sugar-Free Gum by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Adults): Care*Free, Trident, Extra
  • Table 6-8a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Sugar-Free Hard Candy/Breath Mints, 1998 (U.S. Adults)
  • Table 6-8b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Sugar-Free Mints by Brand: BreathSavers vs. Sugar-Free Certs, 1998 (U.S. Adults)
  • Table 6-9: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Jams, Jellies, and Preserves by Selected Types, 1998 (U.S. Adults): All-Fruit/No-Sugar-Added, Light/Reduced-Sugar, Diet
  • Table 6-10: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Sugar-Free Gelatin Mix by Brand: Jell-O vs. Royal, 1998 (U.S. Adults)
  • Table 6-11: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Artificially Sweetened Light Yogurt by Brand: Dannon Light vs. Yoplait Lite, 1998 (U.S. Adults)

Appendix I: Examples Of Consumer Advertising And Promotions

Appendix II: Addresses Of Selected MarketersAnd Promotions

800.298.5294
Int'l: +1.240.747.3095
Questions?
Contact a research specialist >
Most Popular Research
Omega 3 Fatty Acids and the U.S. Food and Beverage Market
Sandwiches in the U.S.: Foodservice and Retail Market and Trends
Ethical Consumers and Corporate Responsibility: The Market and Trends for Green Products in Food and Beverage, Personal Care and Household Items
Functional, Fortified and Inherently Healthy Foods and Beverages: The U.S. Phood Market
Food Flavors and Ingredients Outlook 2007
Natural, Organic and Eco-Friendly Pet Products in the U.S., 2nd Edition
Privacy Policy    |    Terms and Conditions    |    Site Map    |    Return Policy    |    Press    |    Help FAQs
Copyright © 2007 Packaged Facts. All Rights Reserved.
A division of Market Research Group, LLC
Trust-e Logo
Contact Us: 800.298.5294 (U.S.)
or +1.240.747.3095 (Int'l)
Hours: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. EST Monday through Friday