The Household Cleaning Products Market : Packaged Facts

The Household Cleaning Products Market

Sep 1, 1999
230 Pages - Pub ID: LA549
Abstract Table of Contents Search Inside Report Buy By the Section Related Reports

I. Executive Summary

    Scope and Methodology
  • Market Scope
  • Report Methodology
    The Products
  • Six Segments in Surface Cleaners Category
  • All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants
  • Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • Scouring Pads/Sponges
  • Glass Cleaners/Ammonia
  • Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • Floor Cleaners/Waxes
  • Six Segments in Specialty Cleaners Category
  • Rug/Upholstery Cleaners
  • Toilet Bowl Cleaners
  • Drain Openers
  • Spray Disinfectants
  • Oven Cleaners
  • Metal Polishes
    The Market
  • Mass-Market Sales Approach $3.4 Billion in 1998
  • Surface Cleaner Sales at $2.0 Billion
  • Specialty Cleaner Sales at $1.4 Billion
  • Table 1-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales by Product Category, 1994-2003 (dollars): Surface Cleaners, Specialty Cleaners
  • Surface Cleaners Claim 59% of Market
  • Household Cleaners a Mature Market
  • Market Projected to Surpass $3.9 Billion in 2003
    The Marketers
  • Over 50 Notable Household Cleaners Marketers
  • Clorox Claims 22% of Market
  • Figure 1-1: Top Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners, 1998 (percent): Clorox, Reckitt & Colman, S.C. Johnson, Procter & Gamble, All Others
  • Surface Cleaner Leaders
  • Specialty Cleaner Leaders
  • The Reckitt Benckiser Challenge
    Distribution and Retail
  • Range of Outlets
  • Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Market
  • Supermarkets, Drugstores Slipping in Dollar Sales
  • Supermarkets Account for Two-Thirds of Retail Overall
    The Consumer
  • Basic Patterns for Surface Cleaners
  • Basic Patterns for Specialty Cleaners

II. The Overall Market

    The Products
  • Two Market Categories
  • Six Segments in Surface Cleaners Category
  • All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants
  • Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • Scouring Pads/Sponges
  • Glass Cleaners/Ammonia
  • Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • Floor Cleaners/Waxes
  • Considerable Cross-Use Among Surface Cleaners
  • Six Segments in Specialty Cleaners Category
  • Rug/Upholstery Cleaners
  • Toilet Bowl Cleaners
  • Drain Openers
  • Spray Disinfectants
  • Oven Cleaners
  • Metal Polishes
  • Government Regulation
  • FIFRA Eases Rules in Mid-1990s
  • Figure 2-1: U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
    The Market
  • Mass-Market Sales Approach $3.4 Billion in 1998
  • Surface Cleaner Sales at $2.0 Billion
  • Table 2-1: U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners by Product Category: Surface Cleaners vs. Specialty Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
  • Specialty Cleaner Sales at $1.4 Billion
  • Surface Cleaners Claim 59% of Market
  • Figure 2-2: Share of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners by Product Category: Surface Cleaners vs. Specialty Cleaners, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent)
  • Household Cleaners a Mature Market
  • Convenience vs. Conscience
  • Growth in Households
  • Table 2-2: Number of U.S. Households, 1990-2010
  • Less Time to Clean
  • Broader Use Only a Partial Fix
  • The Role of Niche Marketing
  • The Case Against Chemicals
  • Market Projected to Surpass $3.9 Billion in 2003
  • Table 2-3: Projected U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners by Product Category: Surface Cleaners vs. Specialty Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
    The Marketers
  • Over 50 Notable Household Cleaners Marketers
  • Clorox Claims 22% of Market
  • Table 2-4: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Household Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 6 Marketers, Private Label, All Other Marketers
  • Table 2-5: Leading U.S. Household Cleaners Marketers by Brands and Product Categories (59 Marketers and Their Brands)
    Competitive Profile: Clorox Co.
  • Bleach and More
  • Company History
  • Acquisition of First Brands
  • Brand Building and Acquisitions
  • Attention to Details
    Competitive Profile: Reckitt & Colman
  • Keeping Households Clean and Healthy
  • Company History
  • Filling In More Gaps
  • Committing to China
  • Navigating in Troubled Waters
  • Competing in America
  • Reckitt Benckiser
    Competitive Profile: S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
  • A Big Family Business
  • Company History
  • Johnson in the 1990s: Active in Acquisitions
  • Growth Through Innovation
    Competitive Profile: Procter & Gamble Co.
  • P&G Has Both Size and Diversity
  • Company History
  • New Strategies for the Nineties
  • Safety and Testing
  • P&G and Yahoo!
  • Concentrated Versions
    Competitive Briefs
  • Benckiser Consumer Products
  • Clean Shower L.P.
  • Faultless Starch/Bon Ami Co.
  • Iron Out, Inc.
  • Lime-O-Sol
  • Servaas Labs, Inc.
  • Spontex, Inc.
  • 3M
  • J.A. Wright & Co.
    Distribution and Retail
  • Range of Outlets
  • Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Market
  • Table 2-6: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector and Product Category, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 3 Sectors, 2 Categories
  • Supermarkets, Drugstores Slipping in Dollar Sales
  • Supermarkets Account for Two-Thirds of Retail Overall
    The Consumer
  • Basic Consumer Patterns for Surface Cleaners
  • Table 2-7: Consumer Overview for Household Surface Cleaners by Product Type, 1998 (percent): 4 Product Classifications
  • Basic Consumer Patterns for Specialty Cleaners
  • Table 2-8: Consumer Overview for Household Specialty Cleaners by Product Type, 1998 (% Principal Shoppers, Median Age, Median Household Income)

III. Surface Cleaners

    The Products
  • Six Segments in Surface Cleaners Category
  • All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants
  • Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • Scouring Pads/Sponges
  • Glass Cleaners/Ammonia
  • Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • Floor Cleaners/Waxes
  • Considerable Cross-Use Among Surface Cleaners
  • Figure 3-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
    Market Size and Growth
  • Sales Approach $2 Billion in 1998
  • Table 3-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
  • All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants Return to Growth
  • Non-Abrasives Make 27% Jump
  • A Slow-Down in Scouring-Pad Gains
  • Glass Cleaners/Ammonia Gain Momentum
  • Abrasives Continue in Decline
  • Floor Cleaner Sales Are Stagnant
  • Table 3-2a: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners by Product Segment, 1994-1998 (dollars): All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants; Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners; Scouring Pads/Sponges
  • Table 3-2b: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners by Product Segment, 1994-1998 (dollars): Glass Cleaners/Ammonia; Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners; Floor Cleaners/Waxes
    Market Composition
  • All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants Claim One-Third of Category
  • Figure 3-2: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Surface Cleaner Sales by Product Segment, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 6 Product Segments
  • Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Market
  • Figure 3-3: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Surface Cleaner Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): Supermarkets, Mass Merchandisers, Drugstores
  • Only Floor Cleaners Show Regional Skew
  • Table 3-3: Usage by U.S. Region of Selected Household Cleaner Types, 1998 (indices): 5 Product Classifications/6 U.S. Regions
    Factors to Market Growth
  • Broad Applications Suit Busy Lifestyles
  • Niche-Marketing Stimulates Sales
  • Steady Stream of Innovation
  • All-Purpose Disinfectants Benefit Most from FIFRA
  • Shower Cleaners Resurrect Non-Abrasives Segment
  • Scouring Pads/Sponges a Mature Segment
  • Glass Cleaners Tap Potential in Combination Products
  • Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners Revert to Commodity Status
  • Floor Cleaners/Waxes Rocked by New Flooring Trends
  • Figure 3-4: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
    Projected Market Growth
  • Surface Cleaners to Show Moderate Growth
  • Table 3-4: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
  • Growth by Segment
  • Table 3-5a: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners by Product Segment, 1998-2003 (dollars): All-PurposeCleaners/Disinfectants; Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners; Scouring Pads/Sponges
  • Table 3-5b: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Surface Cleaners by Product Segment, 1998-2003 (dollars): Glass Cleaners/Ammonia; Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners; Floor Cleaners/Waxes
    The Marketers
  • 36 Notable Mass Marketers
  • Table 3-6: Number of Major Household Surface Cleaners Marketers by Product Segment, 1998 (number): 6 Product Segments
  • More Brands Than Marketers
  • Table 3-7: Leading U.S. Household Surface Cleaners Marketers by Brands and Product Segments (37 Marketers and Their Brands)
    Marketer and Brand Shares
  • Clorox at 42% Share in All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants
  • Clorox Garners 26% of Non-Abrasives
  • 3M Claims One-Third Share of Scouring Pads/Sponges
  • S.C. Johnson Racks Up 58% of Glass Cleaner/Ammonia Sales
  • Clorox and P&G Dominate in Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • S.C. Johnson Corners 57% of Floor Cleaner Sales
  • Table 3-8: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of All-Purpose Cleaners/Disinfectants, 1998 (percent): 7 Marketers/19 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 3-9: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Non-Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 8 Marketers/13 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 3-10: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Scouring Pads/Sponges, 1998 (percent): 7 Marketers/17 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 3-11: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Glass Cleaners/Ammonia, 1998 (percent): 5 Marketers/7 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 3-12: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 4 Marketers/4 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 3-13: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Floor Cleaners/Waxes, 1998 (percent): 5 Marketers/13 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
    The Competitive Situation
  • Clorox and S.C. Johnson Form the First Tier
  • The Reckitt Benckiser Challenge
  • An Onslaught of New Product Activity
    Marketing and New Product Trends
  • Reformulations to Increase Potency
  • Germ-Killing Surface Cleaners
  • Cleaners with Bleach
  • "Safer" Products
  • Citrus-Based Alternatives
  • New Scents Make Sense
  • New Sizes and Packagings
  • Table 3-14: Selected Household Surface Cleaner New Product Introductions, 1998 - Summer 1999
    Consumer Advertising and Promotion
  • Ad Spending Exceeds $157 Million in 1998
  • Clorox Allots $55 Million
  • S.C. Johnson Second with $36 Million
  • Third-Tier Marketers Hover Around $20 Million
  • Ads Focus on Effectiveness and Power
  • Strong but Safe
  • Germ-Killing Properties
  • Atmospheric Scents
  • Misting Away Shower Care
  • Keeping Floors Clean and Beautiful
  • Combination Copy
  • Coupons Remain Common
  • A Rebate/Lottery
  • Samples of Consumer Advertising
    Trade Advertising and Promotion
  • Products on Parade
  • Standard Approaches to Promotion¾Plus Sampling
    Distribution and Retail
  • Distributors vs. Direct Distribution
  • Warehousing vs. Direct Store Delivery
  • Advantages of Warehouse Delivery
  • Disadvantages of Warehouse Delivery
  • Advantages of Direct Store Delivery
  • Disadvantages of Direct Store Delivery
  • ECR and Category Management
  • Range of Outlets
  • Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Category
  • Table 3-15: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Surface Cleaner Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector and Product Segment, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 3 Sectors, 6 Segments
  • Supermarkets, Drugstores Slipping in Dollar Sales
  • Supermarkets Account for Two-Thirds of Retail Overall
  • Retail Margins at 25%-34%
    Consumer Overview: Surface Cleaners
  • Note on Simmons Market Research Bureau Data
  • Range of Data
  • Basic Consumer Patterns
  • Table 3-16: Consumer Overview for Household Surface Cleaners by Product Type, 1998 (percent): 4 Product Classifications, Entire Sample
    Consumer Focus: Scouring Pads/Sponges
  • 96 Million Purchasers of Scouring Pads/Sponges
  • Income and Education Are Indicators by Product Type
  • Indicators by Brand Preference
  • Table 3-17: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Scouring Pads/Sponges by Product Type: Non-Steel Wool vs. Steel Wool, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 3-18: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Scouring Pads/Sponges by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): S.O.S, Brillo, Scotch Brite
    Consumer Focus: Window/Glass Cleaners
  • 106 Million Purchasers of Window/Glass Cleaners
  • Use on Glass, Non-Glass, or Both
  • Distinct Demographics for Non-Glass Users
  • Broad Draw for Windex
  • Table 3-19: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Window/Glass Cleaners by Surface Type, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Glass, Non-Glass, Both
  • Table 3-20: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Window/Glass Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Glass Plus, Ajax, Formula 409
    Consumer Focus: Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • 88 Million Purchasers of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners
  • Liquids and Gels Draw Up-Market Users
  • Little Consumer Differentiation to Kitchen vs. Bathroom Use
  • Demographics by Brand
  • Table 3-21: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners by Product Type, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Powder, Liquid, Gel
  • Table 3-22: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners by Place Most Often Used: Bathroom vs. Kitchen, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 3-23: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Abrasive Tub/Tile Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Comet, Ajax, Soft Scrub
    Consumer Focus: Floor Cleaners/Waxes
  • 33 Million Purchasers of Floor Cleaners/Waxes
  • Demographic Indicators
  • Younger Profile for Cleans & Waxes Products
  • Mop & Glo vs. Second-Tier Brands
  • Table 3-24: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Floor Waxes/Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 3-25: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Floor Waxes/Cleaners by Product Type: Cleans & Waxes vs. Waxes Only, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 3-26: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Mop & Glo Brand Floor Waxes/Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 3-27: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Purchase of Floor Waxes/Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Future, Armstrong (any), Brite

IV. Specialty Cleaners

    The Products
  • Six Segments in Specialty Cleaner Category
  • Rug/Upholstery Cleaners
  • Toilet Bowl Cleaners
  • Drain Openers
  • Spray Disinfectants
  • Oven Cleaners
  • Metal Polishes
  • Figure 4-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
    Market Size and Growth
  • Specialty Cleaner Sales Approach $1.4 Billion
  • Table 4-1: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners, 1994-1998 (dollars)
  • Rug Cleaners Surge to $526 Million
  • Toilet Bowl Cleaners Edge Up to $387 Million
  • Drain Openers Slip to $183 Million
  • Spray Disinfectants, at $166 Million, Reverse Decline
  • Oven Cleaners Hold Constant at $64 Million
  • Metal Polishes Rise to $52 Million
  • Table 4-2a: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners by Product Segment, 1994-1998 (dollars): Rug/Upholstery Cleaners, Toilet Bowl Cleaners, Drain Openers
  • Table 4-2b: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners by Product Segment, 1994-1998 (dollars): Spray Disinfectants, Oven Cleaners, Metal Polishes
    Market Composition
  • Rug Cleaners Remain Best-Selling Specialty Cleaner
  • Figure 4-2: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Specialty Cleaner Sales by Product Segment, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 6 Product Segments
  • Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Market
  • Figure 4-3: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Specialty Cleaner Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): Supermarkets, Mass Merchandisers, Drugstores
  • Sales by Region
  • Table 4-3: Usage by U.S. Region of Selected Household Specialty Cleaner Types, 1998 (indices): 6 Product Segments/6 U.S. Regions
    Factors to Market Growth
  • Growth Potential Limited by Lifestyle Factors
  • Rug Cleaners See Promise in Pet Population, Chemical Guards
  • Toilet Bowl Cleaners to Rely on Convenience, Strength
  • Drain Openers Suffer from Ultra-Efficiency
  • FIFRA Amendment Means Opportunity for Spray Disinfectants
  • Oven Cleaners Hurt by Microwave and Self-Cleaning Ovens
  • Metal Polishes Have Rough Road Ahead
  • Figure 4-4: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
    Projected Market Growth
  • Sales Gains Projected at 2.7%-4.0%
  • Table 4-4: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners, 1998-2003 (dollars)
  • Growth by Segment
  • Table 4-5a: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners by Product Segment, 1998-2003 (dollars): Rug/Upholstery Cleaners, Toilet Bowl Cleaners, Spray Disinfectants
  • Table 4-5b: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Projected Mass-Market Sales of Specialty Cleaners by Product Segment, 1998-2003 (dollars): Drain Openers, Oven Cleaners, Metal Polishes
    The Marketers
  • 21 Notable Mass Marketers
  • Table 4-6: Number of Major Household Specialty Cleaner Marketers by Product Segment, 1998 (number): 6 Product Segments
  • Brands Outnumber Marketers
  • Table 4-7: Leading U.S. Household Specialty Cleaner Marketers by Brands and Product Segments (37 Marketers and Their Brands)
    Marketer and Brand Shares
  • Reckitt & Colman Claims 18% of Rug Cleaner Segment
  • Reckitt & Colman at 29% Share of Toilet Bowl Cleaners
  • Clorox and S.C. Johnson Lead Drain Opener Segment
  • Reckitt & Colman Monopolizes Spray Disinfectants
  • Reckitt & Colman Racks Up 61% of Oven Cleaner Sales
  • Wright Claims One-Fifth of Metal Polish Segment
  • Table 4-8: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Rug/Upholstery Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 7 Marketers/15 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 4-9: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Toilet Bowl Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 5 Marketers/14 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 4-10: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Drain Openers, 1998 (percent): 2 Marketers/3 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 4-11: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Spray Disinfectants, 1998 (percent): Reckitt & Colman/Lysol, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 4-12: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Oven Cleaners, 1998 (percent): 2 Marketers/3 Brands, All Other Marketers, Private Label
  • Table 4-13: Marketer Shares of U.S. Mass-Market Sales of Metal Polishes, 1998 (percent): 4 Marketers/6 Brands, All Other Marketers
    The Competitive Situation
  • Reckitt Dominates Market and Brand Leadership
  • The Catch-22 of New-Improved Products
  • Reformulations Are Primary "New" Product Activity
    Marketing and New Product Trends
  • Larger Segments Show More Innovation
  • "Professional Strength" Products
  • Convenience in Performance and Packaging
  • Getting Down to Germs
  • Fragrance Doesn't Necessarily Follow Function
  • All-Natural Specialty Cleaners
  • Table 4-14: Selected Household Specialty Cleaner New Product Introductions, 1998-Summer 1999
    Consumer Advertising and Promotion
  • Over $140 Million in 1998 Advertising
  • Four Marketers Dominate Advertising
  • Febreze Gives Specialty Cleaners Parity in Media Spending
  • The Effectiveness/Power Appeal
  • More and Better
  • The Varieties of Convenience
  • Putting a Number On It
  • Products Over Plumbers
  • Coupons Remain Most Popular Specialty Cleaners Promotion
  • Extra Product Offered Free
  • Samples of Consumer Advertising
    Trade Advertising and Promotion
  • Products on Parade
  • Standard Approaches to Promotion¾Plus Sampling
    Distribution and Retail
  • Distributors vs. Direct Distribution
  • Warehousing vs. Direct Store Delivery
  • Advantages of Warehouse Delivery
  • Disadvantages of Warehouse Delivery
  • Advantages of Direct Store Delivery
  • Disadvantages of Direct Store Delivery
  • ECR and Category Management
  • Range of Outlets
  • Mass Merchandisers Gain One-Tenth of Category
  • Table 4-15: The U.S. Household Cleaners Market: Share of Specialty Cleaner Sales by Mass-Market Retail Sector and Product Segment, 1994 vs. 1998 (percent): 3 Sectors, 6 Segments
  • Supermarkets, Drugstores Slipping in Dollar Sales
  • Supermarkets Account for Two-Thirds of Retail Overall
  • Retail Margins at 23%-31%
    Consumer Overview: Specialty Cleaners
  • Note on Simmons Market Research Bureau Data
  • Range of Data
  • Basic Consumer Patterns
  • Table 4-16: Consumer Overview for Household Specialty Cleaner Products by Product Type, 1998 (percent): 6 Product Classifications, Entire Sample
    Consumer Focus: Rug Cleaners
  • Nearly 45% of American Principal Shoppers Use Rug Cleaners
  • Middle-Income Middle-Agers Are Typical Users
  • Liquid vs. Aerosol vs. Granules
  • Resolve Preferred by Educated, Professional Women
  • Rug Deodorizers/Fresheners Almost as Popular
  • Race and Income Are Consistent Brand Indicators
  • Table 4-17: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Cleaners/Shampoos, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-18: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Cleaners/Shampoos by Product Type, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Liquid, Aerosol, Powder/Granules
  • Table 4-19: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Cleaners/Shampoos by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Resolve, Woolite, Scotchgard
  • Table 4-20: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Deodorizers/Fresheners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-21: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Rug Deodorizers/Fresheners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Arm & Hammer, Love My Carpet, Glade
    Consumer Focus: Toilet Bowl Cleaners
  • 56% Use In-Bowl Toilet Cleaners
  • 50% Use In-Tank Cleaners
  • Table 4-22: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Bowl Toilet Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-23: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Bowl Toilet Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Lysol, Vanish, Toilet Duck
  • Table 4-24: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Tank Toilet Bowl Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-25a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Tank Toilet Bowl Cleaners by Brand: Vanish vs. 2000 Flushes, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-25b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of In-Tank Toilet Bowl Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Clorox Bleach Tabs, Ty-D-Bol, Sani-Flush
    Consumer Focus: Drain Openers
  • 48% of Principal Shoppers Use Drain Openers
  • Liquid vs. Aerosol vs. Crystal
  • Drano vs. Liquid Plumr
  • Table 4-26: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Drain Openers, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-27: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Drain Openers by Type, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Liquid, Crystal, Aerosol
  • Table 4-28: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Drain Openers by Brand: Drano vs. Liquid Plumr, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
    Consumer Focus: Oven Cleaners
  • Over 40% of Principal Shoppers Use Oven Cleaner
  • Demographics by Brand
  • Table 4-29: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Oven Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-30a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Oven Cleaners by Brand: Easy Off vs. S.O.S., 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-30b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Oven Cleaners by Brand: Dow vs. Arm & Hammer, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
    Consumer Focus: Metal Polishes
  • Higher Economic Status Is Key Indicator
  • 16% Use Silver Polish
  • Demographics by Brand
  • Table 4-31: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Metal Polishes/Cleaners, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-32a: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Metal Polishes/Cleaners by Type: Silver/Silverplate vs. Brass, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-32b: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Metal Polishes/Cleaners by Type: Copper vs. Aluminum, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers)
  • Table 4-33: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Metal Polishes/Cleaners by Brand, 1998 (U.S. Principal Shoppers): Brasso, Wright's, Twinkle

Appendix I: Examples of Consumer Advertising and Promotions

Appendix II: Addresses of Selected Marketers

800.298.5294
Int'l: +1.240.747.3095
Questions?
Contact a research specialist >

Most Popular Research
Lawn and Garden Products in the U.S., 8th Edition
Ethnic Hair, Beauty and Cosmetics Products in the U.S., 6th Edition
The Global Footwear Market: Athletic and non-Athletic Shoes
Ethnic Hair, Beauty and Cosmetics Products in the U.S., 7th Edition
The U.S. Eyewear Market: Prescription and Nonprescription Lenses, Sunglasses, Contact Lenses, and Frames, 2nd Edition
U.S. Pet Market Outlook 2010-2011: Tapping into Post-Recession Pet Parent Spending
Privacy Policy    |    Terms and Conditions    |    Site Map    |    Return Policy    |    Press    |    Help FAQs
Copyright © 2010 Packaged Facts. All Rights Reserved.
A division of Market Research Group, LLC
Contact Us: 800.298.5294 (U.S.)
or +1.240.747.3095 (Int'l)
Hours: Monday - Thursday: 3:00am - 7:00pm EST
Fridays: 3:00am - 6:00pm EST