|
Coffee And Tea Market: 2001
|
Sep 1, 2001
442 Pages - Pub ID: LA419171
|
|
- Executive Summary
Scope and Methodology
- Market Parameters
- Study Methodology
The Coffee/Tea Overall Market
- Overall Market Size and Growth
- Coffee vs. Tea Share
- Factors in Future Growth
- The Major Marketers
- Little Coffee/Tea Crossover
- Starbucks a Volatile Factor
- C/T Product Trends
- Coffee/Tea at Retail
- A Note on Coffee (and Tea) Cafes
The Coffee Market
- Four Major Product Types
- Mass vs. Specialty Coffee
- Coffee Market Size and Growth
- Specialty Coffee Driving Market
- Ground Regular the Leading Product Type
- But Whole Bean Is Gaining
- Factors in Future Growth
- Figure 1-1: Share of Coffee Dollar Sales in FDM Outlets: By Product Type, 2000 (percent): 5 types
- Mass Coffee Controlled by P&G and PM/Kraft
- Second Tier in Flux
- Specialty Coffee: Major Marketers
- The Competitive Situation
- New Product Trends
- Consumer Ad Expenditures
- Retail: Mass vs. Specialty Stores
- Food Stores Lead in Mass Outlets
- Coffee/Tea Stores Lead in Specialty Outlets
- The Consumer
The Tea Market
- Five Major Product Segments
- Tea Market Size and Growth
- RTD the Dominant Segment
- Growth by Product Segment
- Figure 1-2: U.S. Tea Market: Estimated Dollar Share by Product Category, 2000 (percent): 5 categories
- Factors in Future Growth
- Lipton the Dominant Marketer
- Nestlé No. 2
- Other Major Tea Marketers
- The Competitive Situation
- New Product Trends
- Consumer Advertising Expenditures
- Retail: Estimated Share of Sales by Segment and Outlet
- The Overall Market
Coffee/Tea Overview
- Scope of Study: The At-Home Retail Market
- Excludes Foodservice/Institutional/Commercial
- Focus Exceptions
- Products Definitively Outside Scope
Coffee/Tea Classifications
- Coffee: Four Product Types
- Coffee Packaging
- Coffee Niche Products
- Tea: Five Product Types
- Tea Packaging
- Tea Niche Products
- Coffee/Tea Similarities: Natural Plants
- Coffee/Tea Similarities: Product Types
- Coffee/Tea Differences: Natural Plants
- Coffee/Tea Differences: Product Types
Historical Overview
- New to Western World
- Coffee and Tea in the USA
Market Size, Growth, and Composition
- Special Note: Guesswork Estimates
- Retail Coffee/Tea Market at $11 Billion
- Table 2-1: The U.S. Retail Coffee and Tea Market: Estimated Dollar Sales, 1996-2000 (dollars): coffee, tea
- Coffee the Sluggard, Tea the Star
- Coffee Share Dominant, but Tea Is Rising
- Coffee/Tea Regionality
- Figure 2-1: U.S. Retail Coffee and Tea Market: Dollar Share by Product, 1996-2000 (percent): coffee, tea
Factors in Future Growth
- Soft Drinks Rule the Beverage Universe
- Coffee and Milk
- Bottled Water and Tea
- Table 2-2: U.S. Per Capita Consumption of Selected Beverages, 1980-1999 (gallons): five beverage categories
- Beverage Trends: 1995-1999
- Table 2-3: U.S. Per Capita Consumption of Selected Beverages, 1995-1999 (gallons): five beverage categories
- Into 2001: Opportunities for Coffee/Tea
- Age Demographics in Future Growth
- What Will the Aging Baby Boomers Do?
- Gen X and Y Embracing Coffee
- Aging Trends Favor Coffee/Tea
- American Beverage Attribute Preferences
- Coffee Likely to Hold Its Own
- Tea Faces Formidable Obstacles
- But Health Attributes Promising
Coffee/Tea Market: Projected Growth
- Moderate Growth Profile Forecast
- Table 2-4: U.S. Coffee and Tea Market: Projected Retail Sales, 2000-2005 (dollars): overall
The Marketers
- Little Coffee/Tea Crossover
- Starbucks a Volatile Factor
- C/T Product Trends
- Consumer Advertising Expenditures
Distribution/Retail
- Coffee/Tea Distribution: Follows Standard Scheme
- Distributors Play Important Role
- Coffee/Tea at Retail
- A Note on Coffee (and Tea) Cafes
- The Coffee Market
Coffee Market Parameters
- Market Includes Coffee Sold at Retail for Home Consumption
- Most Away-From-Home Sales Not Covered
- Two Gray Areas
- The Coffee "Retail Market"
- Market Excludes Non-Roasted-Bean Products
Coffee: Overview
- Botany/Chemistry
- Geography
- Climate and Environment
- Two Commercial Species
- Arabica
- Robusta
Coffee History
- Mythic Origins
- An Arab Secret for Nearly a Millennium
- Modern History Begins with the Ottomans
- Coffee Drinking Spreads to Europe
- The Dutch Break Ottoman Monopoly
- By Crook, Coffee Transplanted to Caribbean
- By Hook, Coffee Blossoms in Brazil
- Coffee Goes Global
Coffee Production
- Growing and Harvesting
- Processing: Wet and Dry Methods
- Sorting, Grading, Naming, and Packing
- Blending
- Roasting
- Grinding
- Packaging
- Three Value-Added Variations
- Instant/Soluble Coffee
- Decaffeinated Coffee
- Flavored Coffee
Coffee Classifications
- Four Major Product Types
- Ground Coffee
- A Note on Ground Specialty
- Instant Coffee
- Commercial Whole Bean Coffee
- Specialty Coffee
- Retail Product Classifications: Mass-Market vs. Specialty Coffee
Overall Retail Coffee Market: Size, Growth, and Composition
- Difficulties in Estimation
- NCA Says Overall Coffee Market at $18.5 Billion
- Calculating Mass-Retail Coffee Sales
- Calculating Specialty Coffee Sales
- Methodology for Specialty Calculus
- At-Home Retail Coffee Market at $6.9 Billion in 2000
- At-Home Pound Volume Near 1.2 Billion
- Table 3-1: U.S. Retail Coffee Market: Estimated Dollar Sales and Pound Volume, 1996-2000 (dollars, pounds)
- At-Home Sales: Mass vs. Specialty Coffee
- Table 3-2: U.S. Retail Coffee Market: Estimated Dollar Sales and Pound Volume of Mass-Market and Specialty Coffee, 1996-2000 (dollars, pounds): mass-market coffee, specialty coffee
- Specialty Gains Great in Dollar Share, Good in Pound Share
- Table 3-3: U.S. Retail Coffee Market Share of Dollar Sales: Mass-Market vs. Specialty Coffee, 1996-2000 (percent): mass-market coffee, specialty coffee
- Table 3-4: U.S. Retail Coffee Market Share of Pound Volume: Mass-Market vs. Specialty Coffee, 1996-2000 (percent): mass-market coffee, specialty coffee
Mass-Retail Coffee Market: Size, Growth, and Composition
- Preliminary Explanations
- Note on RTD Coffee
- FDM Dollars in the Doldrums
- FDM Pounds Treading Water
- Table 3-5: Total Coffee Dollar Sales and Pound Volume in FDM Outlets, 1997-2000 (dollars, pounds): FDM outlets
- Food Stores: Dominant But Down
- Mass Merchandisers: Gaining Steadily
- Drugstores: Also-Rans Up
- Table 3-6: Coffee Dollar Sales in FDM Outlets by Outlet Type: 1997-2000 (dollars): food stores, drugstores, mass merchandisers
- FDM Pound Volume Dynamics
- Table 3-7: Coffee Pound Volume in FDM Outlets: By Outlet Type, 1997-2000 (pounds): food stores, drugstores, mass merchandisers
- FDM Dollar/Pound Share Dynamics
- Table 3-8: U.S. Coffee Sales in FDM Outlets: Dollar Share by Outlet Type, 1997-2000 (dollars, percent): food stores, drugstores, mass merchandisers
- Table 3-9: U.S. Coffee Sales in FDM Outlets: Pound Share by Outlet Type, 1997-2000 (dollars, percent): food stores, drugstores, mass merchandisers
- FDM Sales by Product Type
- Dollar Sales: Traditional Types Down, Whole Bean Up
- Table 3-10: Coffee Dollar Sales in FDM Outlets: By Product Type, 1997-2000 (dollars): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
- Pound Sales: Similar Picture, Less Drastic
- Table 3-11: Coffee Pound Volume in FDM Outlets: By Product Type, 1997-2000 (pounds): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
- FDM Dollar Share by Type
- FDM Pound Share by Type
- Figure 3-1: Share of Coffee Dollar Sales in FDM Outlets: By Product Type, 2000 (percent): five types
- Figure 3-2: Share of Coffee Pound Volume in FDM Outlets: By Product Type, 2000 (percent): five types
- Ground Coffee on Top in Dollar Share, But Lead Is Slipping
- Table 3-12: Coffee Share of Dollar Sales in FDM Outlets: By Product Type, 1997-2000 (percent): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
- In Pound Share, Ground Losing Less Ground
- Table 3-13: Coffee Share of Pound Volume in FDM Outlets: By Product Type, 1997-2000 (percent): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
Food Store Coffee Market: Size, Growth, and Composition
- Food Stores by Far the Leading Outlet Type
- Dollar and Pound Sales Patterns from 1992
- Table 3-14: U.S. Coffee Sales in Food Stores: Dollar Sales and Pound Volume, 1992-2000 (dollars, pounds)
- Classic Price Inelasticity
- Food Store Pricing Travails Signal Trouble for Mass-Coffee Category
- Product Type Sales Trends Since 1994
- Dollar Sales: Instant Biggest Loser
- Figure 3-3: Average Coffee Prices in Food Stores: 1992-2000 (prices): average in food stores
- Table 3-15: Coffee Dollar Sales in Food Stores: By Product Type, 1994-2000 (dollars): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
- Pounds: Ground Regular Down
- Surprisingly Small Gain for Whole Bean Pounds
- Table 3-16: Coffee Pound Volume in Food Stores: By Product Type, 1994-2000 (pounds): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
- Food Store Dollar Share Trends by Type
- Table 3-17: Coffee Share of Dollar Sales in Food Stores: By Product Type, 1992-2000 (percent): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
- Food Store Pound Share Trends by Type
- Table 3-18: Coffee Share of Pound Volume in Food Stores: By Product Type, 1992-2000 (percent): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
- Food Store Pricing By Type
- Disinflation and Deflation Since 1994
- Table 3-19: Coffee Prices in Food Stores: Average Price per Pound by Product Type, 1992-2000 (price per pound): ground, ground decaf, instant, instant decaf, whole bean
Compositional Briefs
- Ready-to-Drink (RTD) Coffee
- Flavored Coffee
- Single-Origin Specialty Coffee
- Sustainable Coffee
The World Coffee Market
- Record Production in 2000/2001
- Arabica vs. Robusta
- Top Three Producers: Brazil, Vietnam, Colombia
- Second Tier Headed by Indonesia
- Significant Minor Producers
- Table 3-20: Top Ten Coffee-Producing Countries: By Share of World Production, 2000/2001 (percent share): ten countries
- Majors in Arabica
- Majors in Robusta
- Current Production Trends
- Tough Times in the Macroeconomy
Factors in Future Growth
- U.S. Coffee Consumption in the 20th Century
- Daily Drinkers Since 1950
- Figure 3-4: U.S. Per Capita Consumption of Regular and Instant Coffee, 1910-1995 (pounds): per capita consumption
- Resurgence Since 1996 Sparked by Specialty Coffee
- Can Specialty Coffee Keep It Up?
- Good Reasons to Be Optimistic
- Specialty Coffee Consumption Ballooning
- Supply Infrastructure in Place
- Specialty Coffee Distribution Exploding
- Having Tasted of the Fruit, Consumers Demand Quality
- Specialty Challenging Mass Coffee for Supremacy
- Is Conventional Canned Coffee a Dinosaur?
- Specialty Must Overcome Obstacles
- A Major Obstacle: The Shaky Economy
- Potential Supply Limitations
- Will Global Warming Be a Problem?
- Specialty's Connection to the Away-from-Home Experience
- Good Signs for At-Home Sales
- Young Adult Embrace of Specialty Coffee Extremely Positive
- But Some Good News/Bad News
- Generation Y and the Caffeine Kick
- Note on Gen Y's Ethnic Diversity
- What About the Baby Boomers?
- Race/Ethnicity Factor Uncertain
- Asian-Americans a Good Target Group
- A New Cultural Perception of Coffee Taking Shape
- Old Coffee Culture vs. New Coffee Culture
- Liberals vs. Conservatives
- Hip vs. Square
- The Sustainable Coffee Phenomenon
- Its Genesis
- Sustainable Coffee: What It Means
- Can Sustainable Sustain Through Rough Economics?
- Mass Coffee's Wistful Fate
- Niche Potential: RTD Coffee
- Niche Potential: Flavored Coffees
- Other Potentially Promising Niches
- A Final Note on a Languishing Segment: Decaf
Projected Market Growth
- Coffee Market to Grow, But Very Slowly
- Table 3-21: U.S. Coffee Market: Projected Retail Sales, 2001-2005 (dollars)
The Marketers
- Complex International Marketing Structure
- The "C" Market
- Marketers the Central Actors in This Study
- Marketers: Size and Scope
- Mass-Market Coffee: Major Marketers
- Second-Tier Marketers
- Significant Minor Marketers
- Coca-Cola and PepsiCo
- Private Labels
- Specialty Roasters: Another Universe
- Number of Specialty Roasters
- Specialty Coffee: Major Marketers
- Table 3-22: List of Selected Coffee Marketers and Brands, 2000-2001 (list): marketers and brands, product segments
Marketer and Brand Shares
- Explanatory Note
- Duopoly: P&G and PM/Kraft
- Table 3-23: Marketer Shares: Dollar Sales of Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): five marketers, private label, other
- Second-Tier Shakeup: Nestlé, Sara Lee, and Starbucks
- A&P Off a Bit
- Starbucks Sweeps the Field
- Marketer Shares: Ground Regular—Flux at the Top
- Figure 3-5: Leading Coffee Marketers in FDM Outlets: Dollar Share Comparisons, 1998 vs. 2000 (percent change)
- Table 3-24: Marketer Shares: Dollar Sales of Ground Regular Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): seven marketers, private label, other
- Out of the Marketer Picture: Nestlé, Chock Full O' Nuts, and Tetley
- Starbucks Shakes Up Ground Regular
- Community Coffee and Private Label
- F. Gavina & Sons and Reily Foods
- Marketer Shares: Ground Decaf—P&G Virtually Owns Segment
- Table 3-25: Marketer Shares: Dollar Sales of Ground Decaffeinated Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): six marketers, private label, other
- Marketer Shares: Instant Regular—Ruled by PM/Kraft
- Table 3-26: Marketer Shares: Dollar Sales of Instant Regular Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): three marketers, private label, other
- Marketer Shares: Instant Decaf—Kraft, P&G, Nestlé Own Segment
- Table 3-27: Marketer Shares: Dollar Sales of Instant Decaffeinated Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): three marketers, private label, other
- Marketer Shares: Whole Bean—Situation Topsy-Turvy
- Starbucks' Astounding Ascent
- P&G's Amazing Success
- Whole Bean Significant Minors
- Table 3-28: Marketer Shares: Dollar Sales of Whole Bean Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): ten marketers, private label, other
- Whole Bean Marketers Under a Microscope
- Table 3-29: Marketer Shares: Dollar Sales of Whole Bean Coffee in FDM Outlets, 1998-2000 (percent share): ten marketers, private label, other
- Brand Shares: Ground Regular—Folgers and Maxwell House Rule the Roost
- Starbucks Heads up Second Tier
- Table 3-30: Brand Shares: Dollar Sales of Ground Regular Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): 11 brands, private label, other
- Brand Shares: Ground Decaf—Folgers, Maxwell House, and Private Label
- Table 3-31: Brand Shares: Dollar Sales of Ground Decaffeinated Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): eight brands, private label, other
- Brand Shares: Instant Regular—Folgers, General Foods International Coffees, Taster's Choice, Maxwell House
- Table 3-32: Brand Shares: Dollar Sales of Instant Regular Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): 12 brands, private label, other
- Brand Shares: Instant Decaf—Folgers, Tasters Choice
- Table 3-33: Brand Shares: Dollar Sales of Instant Decaffeinated Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): ten brands, private label, other
- Brand Shares: Whole Bean—Eight O' Clock, Starbucks, Folgers Select, Millstone
- Table 3-34: Brand Shares: Dollar Sales of Whole Bean Coffee in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): four brands, private label, other
- Minor Brands: Whole Bean Trends
The Competitive Situation
- A Profound Shift in the Upper Reaches
- Starbucks/Kraft Engineer Shakeup
- Yet Starbucks Is Just the Messenger
- Current Shakeup Has Roots in Post-War Demand Decline
- Top Eight in '60s Boils Down to Top Two in '80s
- Whole Bean Signals Trouble in Mid-80s
- Days of Reckoning Come in 1990s
- Majors Basically Blindsided by Specialty Coffee
- The Majors Take Defensive Steps in Mid-1990s
- But Token Efforts Ineffective to Stem Decline
- Drastic Steps Now Being Taken
- Do the Majors Have a Clue?
- Perhaps They Must Radically Recast the Market
Competitive Profile: Procter & Gamble
- P&G Profile
- The Folgers Story
- P&G Acquires Folgers in 1963—Epic Slugfest Ensues
- P&G's Marketing Genius Boosts Folgers to Top
- Folgers: A Focused Brand
- Focused on a Declining Category
- Struggling to Adapt
- The Classic Roast Line
- Extensions Aimed at Middle-Agers
- Folgers Café Latte
- Specialty Strategy: Millstone Acquisition
- Is Folgers Franchise in Trouble?
Competitive Profile: Philip Morris/Kraft Foods
- Parent Philip Morris
- Kraft Foods Profile
- Philip Morris Acquires Nabisco
- IPO Spin "Out" of Kraft/Nabisco
- PM Machinations Impact Kraft Coffee Moves
- Kraft Coffee Brands
- Maxwell House Origins
- The Maxwell House Line
- Kraft's Mysterious Coffee Strategy
- Joint-Venture with Starbucks
- Overseas Coffee Interests
- The Gevalia Mail-Order Brand
- Kraft Partners with Choice Hotels
Competitive Profile: Nestlé
- Nestlé USA-Beverage Division
- Global Partnership with Coca-Cola
- Nestlé Sells Off Ground Coffee Brands
- Nestlé's Instant Orientation Makes Move Inevitable
- Nestlé Has U.S. Impact with Taster's Choice
- The Taster's Choice Brand Line
- The Nescafe Line
- Nescafe Frothé
Competitive Profile: Sara Lee
- Sara Lee Coffee & Tea Enters U.S. Market
- Acquires Chock Full O' Nuts
- Acquires Nestlé Ground Brands: Hills Brothers, Chase & Sanborn, MJB
- Acquires Superior, Wechsler, Continental
- Sara Lee Just Keeps Acquiring
- Sara Lee Positions for World Dominance
- Restructuring Superior Coffee
- Promoting Chock and Hills Brothers
Competitive Profile: Starbucks
- The Most Dynamic Force in Coffee
- Expanding Like Crazy
- Widely Extending Distribution Network
- Beyond Coffee
- Two Major Joint Ventures
- J-V with PepsiCo Yields "Gatorade" of RTD Coffee
- J-V with Kraft Yields Major Shakeup at Mass Retail
- The Phenomenal Success of Starbucks' Rollout
- Most Mass Gains Made in Ground
- The Permanent Starbucks Effect
- New CEO
- New Issues, Old Momentum
Competitive Profile: Seattle Coffee Co.
- Multifaceted Coffee Roaster/Marketer/Retailer
- Seattle's Best
- Seattle's Best in Supermarkets
Competitive Profile: Green Mountain Coffee
- A Leading Specialty Marketer
- Focus on Foodservice
- Concentrating on Gas Stations and OCS
- Expanding into Supermarkets
Competitive Profile: Rowland Coffee Roasters
- Rowland Owned by Souto Family of South Florida
- Tetley's Major U.S. Espresso Operation
- Café Bustelo vs. Café Pilon
- Consolidation of Cuban Espresso Empire
Competitive Profile: Mother Parker's Tea and Coffee
- Tetley's Anglo Brands to Mother Parker's
- State-of-the-Art Roasting Facilities
- But Can It Advertise?
Competitive Focus: RTD Coffee Marketers
- A Segment Just Waiting to Happen
- The Next Iced Tea? No, Not Yet
- Table 3-35: RTD Coffee: Marketers and Brands, 1990-1999 (list): marketers, brands, descriptions
- Optimists Keep the Faith
- Missing Piece of the Puzzle: Advertising
- Profile: East Coast Beverage Corp. (Coffee House USA)
- Profile: Coca-Cola (Planet Java)
- Other Marketers Entering RTD
- Nestlé Not Entering
Competitive Focus: Sustainable Coffee Marketers
- A Niche Rapidly Gaining Momentum
- The Meaning of Sustainability
- But Who Decides What Meets Criteria?
- Certifying Organizations Arise
- The Rainforest Alliance
- The Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center
- TransFair USA
- TransFair's Pressure Tactics vs. Starbucks
- TransFair Converts Green Mountain
- Equal Exchange
- Sustainability Critique: On Price, Quality, and Credibility
- One Sustainable Offshoot: The Native American Hookup
- Maya Gold from Oneida/Kekchi
- Another Offshoot: A "Faith-Based" Coffee Charity
New Product Trends
- Whole Bean Intros Proliferate
- Organic Coffees a Big Trend
- Fair Trade Coffee
- Flavored Coffees a Perennial Trend
- Flavored Single-Packs an Active Niche
- The Valve-Pack
- Instant Cappuccinos/Lattes Gain Momentum
- Minor Decaf Trend to Swiss Water
- Little Activity in Extracts
- Plenty of Entries in RTD
- "Alternative" Coffees Abound
- Alternative Star: Kick-N-Koffee
- On the Horizon: Coffee Mimics Tea in Health Effects
- Selected New Products
- Table 3-36: Coffee: Selected New Product Introductions, 2000-2001 (list): 59 marketers, brands, descriptions
Consumer Advertising Expenditures: Coffee
- Amount Spent in 2000
- PM/Kraft Expenditures
- P&G Expenditures
- Nestlé Expenditures
Advertising Positioning
- Good Taste
- Positive Stimulation
- Internal vs. Social Stimulation
- Targeting Adults: The Older Crowd
- Cross-Demographic Appeal
- Targeting Adults: The Younger Crowd
- Low-Key Approach
- Music and Parents
- RTD Positioning
Consumer Promotions
- Standard Techniques Utilized
- Coupon Offers
- Game Promotion
- Gift with Purchase
- Music Sponsorships
- Broadway/Entertainment Promos
- Charity Promos
- Direct Mail Promos
- Newspaper Promos
- Free Merchandise to Lure Subscription Customers
Trade Advertising and Promotions
- Coffee Marketers Are Heavy Trade Advertisers
- Trade Promotions
At the Retail Level
- Mass-Retail Channels
- Specialty Retail Channels
- Food Store Margins Fall
- Food Stores Fighting a Two-Front War
- The Price Front
- Significantly Lower Discounter Price Structure
- Table 3-37: Average Price Per Pound of Coffee: Food Stores vs. Mass Merchandisers, 1997-2000 (prices, percent differential)
- Discounter Supercenters Poised to Make Gains
- Warehouse Clubs Also Challenge Food Stores
- Food Stores Losing on Quality/Convenience
- Supermarkets' Defense
- Some Install In-Store Coffee Bars
- Specialty Outlets Led by Coffee/Tea Stores
- Upscale Stores Losing At-Home Sales
- Reasons Proffered by Gourmet Retailer
- Natural Foods Stores Gain in Organic/Sustainable Coffee
Retail Focus: Coffee Cafes
- Explosion of Locations
- Distinctions: Cafes, Bars, Kiosks, Carts
- Based on Quality, Coffee, Service
- Not Necessarily Money Machines
- Starbucks in a Class by Itself
- Second-Tier Chains
- Chains Press Independents
- Coffee Cafes a Victim of Success
- New Constraints on Expansion
- Big Chains Triumph
- Small Chains Differentiate
- Larger Chains Try to Expand
- Brief Profiles
- Diedrich Coffee Co.
- Caribou Coffee Co.
- Peets Coffee and Tea
- Tully's Coffee Corp.
- Seattle Coffee Co.
- McDonald's McCafe
- Selected Coffee Cafe Chains
- Table 3-38: Selected Coffee Cafe Chains: 2000 (list): coffee cafe chains, headquarters, number of units
The Consumer
- Number of Users: Ground, Instant Whole Bean
- Different Dynamics for Ground/Instant
- Frequency of Use: Ground Coffee
- Frequency of Use: Instant Coffee
- Number of Users: International-Flavored Instant
- Factors Favoring Use: Ground, Instant, and Whole Bean Forms
- Factors Favoring Use: Ground Regular
- Factors Favoring Use: Ground Decaf
- Factors Favoring Use: Major Ground Brands
- Factors Favoring Use: Instant Coffee
- Factors Favoring Use: Major Instant Brands
- Factors Favoring Use: Espresso/Cappuccino
- Factors Favoring User: Starbucks and Gevalia
- Table 3-39: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Coffee: By Product Form (listing): 9 factors
- Table 3-40: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Ground Regular and Decaffeinated Coffee: All vs. Heavy Users (listing): 9 factors
- Table 3-41: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Ground Coffee: By Brand (listing): 9 factors
- Table 3-42: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Instant Coffee: By Product Type (listing): 9 factors
- Table 3-43: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Instant Coffee: By Brand (listing): 9 factors
- Table 3-44: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Specialty Coffee: By Type and Brand (listing): 9 factors
- The Tea Market
Tea Market Parameters
- Market Includes Tea Products Sold at Retail
- Tea Market Parameters Simpler Than Coffee
- Apparent Complexity: RTD Teas
- Actual Complexity: Herbal Teas ("Tisanes")
- Market Excludes Tea Additive Products
Tea: Overview
- Botany/Taxonomy
- Botany/Chemistry
- Geography
- Climate/Environment
Tea History
- Etymology
- Legendary Origin in China
- Tea May Go Back to the "Stone Age"
- Historical Record Begins in Sixth Century
- Use in Ceremonial Rituals
- Dutch Bring Tea to Europe
- British and Dutch Break China Monopoly
- Tea a Negative Symbol in American Folklore
- America as Tea Innovator
- Is Tea on the Brink of a Breakthrough?
Tea Production
- Growing/Harvesting
- Tea Leaf Classifications
- Processing Determines Form
- Black Tea (Fermented)
- Green Tea (Unfermented)
- Oolong Tea (Semi-Fermented)
- Grading, Packing, Value-Adding
Tea Classifications
- Five Product Segments
- Regular Tea
- Instant/Mix Teas—and Chai
- Ready-to-Drink (RTD) Tea
- RTD Characteristics
- Cold-Fill RTDs
- Hot-Fill RTDs
- RTD Tea Highly Subsegmented
- Specialty Tea
- Herbal Teas
- Flavor vs. Health Herbals
- An Emerging Segment: Organic Tea
- Two New Types of "Tea": Rooibos and Yerba Mate
Overall Market: Size, Growth, and Composition
- Overview
- Methodology
- U.S. Tea Market at $4.2 Billion in 2000
- Table 4-1: U.S. Retail Tea Market: Overall Estimated Size and Growth, 1996-2000 (dollars)
- Sales: RTD Tea
- Table 4-2: U.S. Retail Tea Market: Overall Estimated Size and Growth by Product Category, 1996-2000 (dollars): RTD, regular, specialty, herbal, instant mix
- Sales: Regular Tea
- Sales: Specialty Tea
- Sales: Herbal Tea
- Sales: Instant/Mix Tea
- RTD Leads in Share by Category
- Figure 4-1: U.S. Tea Market: Estimated Dollar Share by Product Category, 2000 (percent): five categories
Mass Market: Size, Growth, and Composition
- Overview: Monitored FDM Sales
- FDM Sales Near $1.6 Billion
- Table 4-3: Tea Dollar Sales by Product Category in FDM Outlets,
- 1996-2000 (dollars): bag/loose, RTD, instant/mix
- Sales: Bagged/Loose
- Sales: RTD
- Sales: Instant/Mix
- Trends in FDM Product Share
- Table 4-4: Dollar Share of Tea Sales in FDM Outlets: By Product Category, 1996-2000 (percent): three categories
- Trends in Unit Volume Sales
- Table 4-5: Tea Unit Volume in FDM Outlets: By Product Category, 1996-2000 (units): bag/loose, RTD, instant/mix
- FDM Share by Outlet Type
- Food Stores Dominate All Three Categories
- Figure 4-2: U.S. Tea Market: Estimated FDM Dollar Share, 2000 (percent): food stores, drugstores, mass merchandisers
- Table 4-6: Retail Share of Product Category Dollar Sales: By FDM Outlet Type, 2000 (percent): food stores, drugstores, mass merchandisers
- RTD Tea: FDM vs. Non-FDM Outlets
- "Alternative" RTDs Flat
- Sales: Refrigerated Teas
- RTD Consumption by Region
The World Market
- World Production
- Leading Tea Producers
- Table 4-7: Top Ten Tea-Producing Countries: By Share of World Production, 2000 (percent share): ten countries
- Africa Arising
- Top World Tea Markets
Factors in Future Growth
- Tea Finally Poised to Take Off
- Health Most Positive Factor
- Another Positive: Aging Baby Boomers
- What About Gen X and Y?
- The Race/Ethnicity Factor
- Tea and the Economy
- "Globalization" Good for Tea
- Tea Supply Favorable
- Tea Could Better Weather Climate Change
- Cold Tea Still Holds Sway
- Tea Makes Waves at Colleges
- Green Tea: Positive Past, Positive Future
- Chai Continues to Hold Promise
- Sustainable Tea Could Well Grow
- Rooibos: A Promising Niche
- Yerba Mate: An All-New U.S. Possibility
- Alternative RTD Teas: A Marketing Challenge
Projected Market Growth
- Positive Growth for Tea Foreseen
- Table 4-8: U.S. Tea Market: Projected Retail Sales, 2001-2005 (dollars)
The Marketers
- Lipton Dominates U.S. Tea
- Nestlé a Solid Second
- No Others with Cross-Category Strength
- RTD Tea: Lipton and Nestlé Lead
- Cadbury-Schweppes/Snapple and FV&S/Arizona Form Second Tier
- RTD Tea: Significant Minors
- Regular Tea: Significant Minors
- Specialty Tea Leaders
- Herbal Tea Leaders
- Players in Instant/Mix
- Table 4-9: Selected List of Tea Marketers and Brands (list): 123 marketers and brands, product segments
Marketer and Brand Shares
- Introductory Note
- Lipton Leads in FDM Share, Followed by Nestlé
- Snapple, Celestial, and Bigelow in Second Tier
- Ferolito, Vultaggio a Major in Convenience Outlets
- Private Label with Strong FDM Presence
- Table 4-10: Marketer Shares: Tea Dollar Sales in FDM Outlets, 2000 (percent share): five marketers, private label, other
- Marketer Shares: Bag/Loose Tea
- Table 4-11: Marketer Shares: Dollar Sales of Bag/Loose Tea in FDM Outlets, 1998 vs. 2000 (percent share): 11 marketers, private label, other
- Brand Shares: Bag/Loose Tea
- Table 4-12: Brand Shares: Dollar Sales of Bag/Loose Tea in FDM Outlets, 1998 vs. 2000 (percent share): 15 brands, other
- Marketer Shares: RTD Tea
- Table 4-13: Marketer Share: Dollar Sales of RTD Tea in FDM Outlets, 1998 vs. 2000 (percent share): six marketers, private label, other
- Brand Share: RTD Tea
- Table 4-14: Brand Shares: Dollar Sales of RTD Tea in FDM Outlets, 1998 vs. 2000 (percent share): 11 brands, other
- Marketer Shares: Instant/Mix Tea
- Table 4-15: Marketer Share: Dollar Sales of Instant/Mix Tea in FDM Outlets, 1998 vs. 2000 (percent share): six marketers, private label, other
- Brand Shares: Instant/Mix Tea
- Table 4-16: Brand Share: Dollar Sales of Instant/Mix Tea in FDM Outlets, 1998 vs. 2000 (percent share): nine brands, private label, other
The Competitive Situation
- Big Three Soft Drink Giants Now with Significant Stake
- Lipton/Pepsi, Nestlé/Coke, Snapple/Cadbury
- Cadbury Takeover of Snapple Marks New Phase in Competition
- The Alternative Beverage Scramble
- Hain Celestial and Tata/Tetley
- FV&S and Bigelow Remain Independent—For Now
- Competing by Fielding New Products
Competitive Profile: Thomas J. Lipton Co.
- Overview
- Dominates U.S. Tea Sales
- Product Activity: 1994-2000
- Lipton Cold Brew
- Lipton, Pepsi, and RTD Tea
- Lipton Brisk
- Lipton Iced Tea
- PepsiCo Acquires SoBe
Competitive Profile: Hain Celestial Group
- Celestial Preeminent in Herbal Tea
- An Entrepreneurial Company
- Wide-Ranging Retail Presence
- Product Line
- International Scope
- Ownership Changes in the 1980s
- Founder Mo Siegel Returns in 1990s
- Branching into Herbal Supplements
- A New CEO Invigorates Celestial
- Extremely Active in 1999/2000
- Enter Hain Foods
- Hain Celestial a Powerhouse in Natural Foods
- Will Celestial Be Neglected?
- Profile: Hain Foods
- From Trade to Consumer Advertising
- Hain and Heinz
Competitive Profile: Snapple Beverage
- Pioneered Alternative Beverages
- A Bad Move: Snapple Acquired by Quaker Oats in 1994
- Flourished Under Triarc
- Stewart's and Mistic
- The Snapple RTD Tea Line
- Snapple Acquired by Cadbury-Schweppes
Competitive Profile: Ferolito, Vultaggio & Sons
- A Huge Success with Arizona
- Artful Bottles
- Cutting-Edge Formulations
- FV&S Collaborates with Celestial
- The AriZona Rx Line
Competitive Profile: R.C. Bigelow
- Founded by Socialite/Entrepreneur Ruth Campbell Bigelow
- A Leader in Specialty Tea
- Mass-Retail Sales
Competitive Profile: Tata Tea/Tetley
- Tetley No. 2 in World Tea
- Tetley in the U.S. Market
- Tetley Acquired by Tata
- Great Synergistic Potential
Competitive Focus: Specialty/Herbal Marketers
- A New Breed of Alternative-Style Tea Marketers
- Stash Tea Co.
- The Republic of Tea
- Tazo
- Oregon Chai
New Product Trends
- Tea Market Deluged with New Products
- Spilling over to Other Consumer Categories
- Key Trends
- Specialty Teas
- Two Examples of Specialty Lines
- Table 4-17: Selected List of Specialty Tea Marketers Offering New Products: In Traditional Variations, 2000-2001 (list): 21 marketers
- Green Teas
- Table 4-18: Selected List of Specialty/Herbal Tea Marketers Offering New Products: In Green Tea Variations, 2000-2001 (list): 14 marketers
- Organic Teas
- Table 4-19: Selected List of Specialty/Herbal Tea Marketers Offering New Products: In Organic Variations, 2000-2001 (list): 15 marketers
- Herbal Teas Proliferating—Mainly Health Herbals
- Table 4-20: Selected List of Herbs Used in Recent Tea Introductions, 1998-2001 (list): 41 herbs
- Examples of "Wellness" Tea Lines
- A Variation: Women's Teas
- A Deluge of Chais
- In Concentrates/Lattes
- In Teabags
- In Instant/Mix Form
- In Novel Flavors
- Chai Organic Teas
- Novel Chai Variations
- Trends in Instant/Mix
- Iced Teabags
- Offbeat Tea Forms
- Diet Teas
- Trends in Rooibos Teas
- Trends in Yerba Mate
- Selected New Product Introductions
New Product Trends: RTD Tea
- Exciting Trends Are in Specialty/Herbal RTDs
- Table 4-21: Selected List of Tea Marketers Offering New Products: In RTD Tea, 2000-2001 (list): 31 herbs
- Trends at the Top
- Key Specialty/Herbal Trends
- Green Herbals
- Functional Herbaceuticals
- Specialty RTDs
- Organic RTDs
- MicroBrew Tea
- Tea/Cola, Tea Smoothie, Frozen Tea
- Recovery RTDs
- Unique Bottles
- Table 4-22: Selected New Tea Product Introductions, 2000-2001 (list): marketers, brands, descriptions
Consumer Advertising Expenditures
- Consumer Advertising Expenditures: Tea
- Lipton Expenditures
- PM/Kraft Expenditures
- Nestlé Expenditures
- Snapple Expenditures
Advertising Positioning
- Hot Tea: No Strong Theme
- Cold Tea: Convenience
- RTD Tea: Cold, Convenient—Add Action
- RTD Pitched to Youth
- Lipton Brisk's "Popeye" Ads
- Nestlé's Cool "Snowman" Ads
- No Adult RTD Ads As Yet
Consumer Promotions
- Most Standard Techniques Used
- Lipton Promos
- Snapple's Promos
At the Retail Level
- Almost Two-Thirds of Sales Through Untracked Outlets
- Tea Margins in Supermarkets
- Shelf Space in Supermarkets
- Supermarkets: Multi-Location Merchandising
- Supermarket Retailer Attitudes
- Tea in Warehouse Clubs
- Tea in Natural Foods Stores
- Tea in Gourmet/Specialty Stores
- Focus: Tea Cafes
- Why Tea Cafes Have Yet to Take Off
- Little Capital for Expansion
- Tealuxe
- Most Located on West and East Coasts
- Examples of Tea Cafes
- Some Common Tea Cafe Characteristics
- Some Divergences
- Can Be Quite Profitable
- Optimists vs. Realists
The Consumer
- Number of Users: Bag/Loose
- Number of Users: Hot vs. Iced
- Number of Users: Regular vs. Decaf
- Use by Sex
- Number of Users: Loose Tea
- Frequency of Use: Bag/Loose
- Number of Users by Type/Flavor
- Number of Users: Instant/Mix
- Frequency of Use
- Number of Users: By Sweetener Type
- Factors Favoring Use: Bag/Loose Tea
- Factors Favoring Tea Bag Use: Regular/Decaf
- Factors Favoring Loose Use: Regular/Decaf
- Factors Favoring Use: Regular vs. Herbal and Fruit/Spice
- Factors Favoring Bag/Loose Use: Major Brands
- Factors Favoring Use: Instant/Mix Tea
- Factors Favoring Instant/Mix Use: By Sweetener Type
- Factors Favoring Instant/Mix Use: Major Brands
- RTD Tea: Number of Users
- Use by Sex
- Factors Favoring Use: RTD Tea
- Factors Favoring Use: Regular vs. Diet RTD Tea
- Factors Favoring Use: By Major Brands
- Table 4-23: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Bag/Loose Tea: By Hot vs. Iced (listing): 9 factors
- Table 4-24: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Regular and Decaffeinated Tea: Bags vs. Loose (listing): 9 factors
- Table 4-25: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Bag/Loose Tea: Regular vs. Herbal and Fruit/Spice Tea (listing): 9 factors
- Table 4-26: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Bag/Loose Tea: By Major Brands (listing): 9 factors
- Table 4-27: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Instant/Mix Tea: Sweetened vs. Unsweetened (listing): 9 factors
- Table 4-28: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use of Instant/Mix Tea: By Major Brands (listing): 9 factors
- Table 4-29: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use: RTD Tea (listing): 8 factors
- Table 4-30: Demographic Characteristics Favoring Use: Major RTD Brands (listing): 8 factors
Appendix I: Examples of consumer and trade advertising and promotions
Appendix II: Addresses of selected marketers
|
800.298.5294
Int'l: +1.240.747.3095
Questions?
Contact a research specialist >
Most Popular Research
White Paper: Food and Beverage Packaging Trends in the U.S.: Consumer Choices and Marketer Opportunities
Gourmet, Specialty and Premium Foods, Beverages and Consumer Trends in the U.S., 8th Edition
White Paper: Packaged Facts on Shopper Demand for RTD Beverages
Gluten-Free Foods and Beverages in the U.S., 3rd Edition
Hispanic Food and Beverages in the U.S.: Market and Consumer Trends in Latino Cuisine, 4th Edition
Prepared Foods and Ready-to-Eat Foods at Retail: The New Competition to Foodservice
|