|
The U.S. Breakfast Market: Cereals
|
Jan 1, 2001
218 Pages - Pub ID: LA597
|
|
- Executive Summary
- Scope and Methodology
- The Scope of This Report
- Report Methodology
- The Products
- Two Breakfast Cereal Categories: Hot and Cold
- Three Cold Cereal Types: Sweetened, Natural, and Regular
- Hot Cereals Are Either Regular or Instant
- Other Ways of Classifying Breakfast Cereals
- The Market
- Breakfast Cereals in Rally to $9.7 Billion in 2000
- Cold Cereals in Push to $8.8 Billion
- Hot Cereals Truly Hot, at $919 Million
- Table 1-1: U.S. Retail Dollar Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Category, 1995-2005
- Breakfast Cereals Push to $11.5 Billion in 2005
- Cold Cereals to Reach $10.4 Billion
- Figure 1-1: U.S. Retail Dollar Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Category, 1995-2005 (dollars): Cold (R-T-E), Hot
- Hot Cereals in Steady Growth to $1.1 Billion
- Basic Nutrition, Plus...
- Convenient—But Not Convenient Enough
- New Health Claims Allowed
- Kids Are an Evergreen Audience
- Supermarkets Losing Share to Mass Merchandisers
- Table 1-2: Share of U.S. Retail Dollar Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Channel, 1995-2000 (percent): Supermarkets, Mass Merchandisers, Drugstores, Other Outlets
- The Marketers
- Six Major Marketers
- In Cold Cereals, General Mills Edges Out Kellogg
- Quaker Has Rock Solid Command of Hot Cereals
- A Game of Intense Marketing and New Product Development
- The Price Pressure
- A Strong Trend: Cross-Positioning to Multiple Audiences
- Ad Spending at $769 Million in 1999
- Six Million-Dollar Ad Spenders
- Much Cold Cereal Is Sold "On Deal
- A Sophisticated Array of Promotions
- Distribution and Retail
- The Classic Four-Step Path, Plus DSD
- Supermarkets Dominate Cereal Scene
- Retail Margins Narrowing
- The Consumer
- Almost 99 Million Purchase Cold Cereals for Their Households
- No Demographics Stand out in Overall Cold Cereal Purchase/Use
- Over Half of Decision-Makers Cite Heavy Cold Cereal Consumption
- Nearly 71 Million Purchase Hot Cereals
- Older Folks, African Americans Mark Hot Cereals Use
- Heavy Use of Hot Cereals Dominates
- The Products
- Introduction
- Scope of This Report
- Clarification of Terms
- Supermarket
- Market/Category/Segment
- The Products
- Definition of the Word "Cereal"
- Cereal Grains
- Other Ingredients
- Breakfast Cereal Manufacturing Processes
- Granolas and Mueslis
- "Enriched" versus "Fortified" versus "Nutraceutical"
- Two Breakfast Cereal Categories: Hot and Cold
- Three Cold Cereal Types: Sweetened, Natural, and Regular
- Hot Cereals Are either Regular or Instant
- Other Ways of Classifying Breakfast Cereals
- Semi-Naturals
- Packaging
- Freshness Dating
- Regulation
- Agencies Involved
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
- The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1994
- The FDA's 11 Permissible "Relationship" Claims
- The Market
- Market Size and Growth
- Breakfast Cereals in Rally to $9.7 Billion in 2000
- Table 3-1: U.S. Retail Dollar Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Category, 1995-2000 (dollars): Cold (R-T-E), Hot
- Figure 3-1: U.S. Retail Dollar Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Category, 1995-2005 (dollars): Cold (R-T-E), Hot
- Cold Cereals in Push to $8.8 Billion
- Hot Cereals Truly Hot, at $919 Million
- A Mature Market Stimulated by Healthier Products, Retail Channel Strategies
- Sales Growth Dampened by High Prices, Breakfast Alternatives
- Cereal Volume Rises to 3.5 Billion Pounds
- Cold Cereal Volume Restored to 3.1 Billion Pounds
- Hot Cereal Volume Climbs to 434 Million Pounds
- Table 3-2: U.S. Pound Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Category, 1997-2000 (pound): Cold (R-T-E), Hot
- Average Price Still Climbing
- Table 3-3: U.S. Average Retail Price of Breakfast Cereals, by Category, 1997-2000 (dollars): Cold (R-T-E), Hot
- Factors in Future Growth
- Basic Nutrition, Plus..
- Convenient—But Not Convenient Enough
- New Health Claims Allowed
- Kids Are an Evergreen Audience
- Table 3-4: Projected U.S. Births, 2000-2010 (number)
- A Trend to Some Indulgence in Eating
- The Advent of Barley Cereals
- The Issue of High Price
- Boomers Are Feeling Old
- Table 3-5: Projection of U.S. Population by Age, 2000-2010 (number): 6 age brackets
- The Grain Supply—Minimal Effect on Price
- Projected Sales
- Breakfast Cereals Push to $11.5 Billion in 2005
- Cold Cereals to Reach $10.4 Billion
- Hot Cereals in Steady Growth to $1.1 Billion
- Table 3-6: Projected U.S. Retail Dollar Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Category, 2000-2005 (dollars): Cold (R-T-E), Hot
- Market Composition: By Product
- Cold Cereals Losing Share to Hot
- Table 3-7: Share of U.S. Retail Dollar Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Category, 1995-2000 (percent): Cold (R-T-E), Hot
- Market Composition: By Outlet
- Supermarkets Losing Share to Mass Merchandisers
- Supermarkets Lose Cold Cereal Dollars
- Supermarkets Manage to Swell Hot Cereal Share
- Table 3-8: Share of U.S. Retail Dollar Sales of Breakfast Cereals, by Channel, 1995-2000 (percent): Supermarkets, Mass Merchandisers, Drugstores, Other Outlets
- Market Composition: Regionality
- Special Note on Simmons Regionality Data
- South Leads in Cold Cereal Sales
- Table 3-9: Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Census Region, 1999 (number and percent): South, Midwest, West, Northeast
- Cold Cereal Regionality, by Product Type
- Regular
- Sweetened
- Natural
- Table 3-10: Household Use of Cold Breakfast Cereal Types, by Census Region, 1999 (number and percent): Regular, Sweetened, Natural; South, Midwest, West, Northeast
- South Also Leads in Hot Cereal Sales
- Table 3-11: Household Use of Hot (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Census Region, 1999 (number and percent): South, Midwest, West, Northeast
- The Marketers
- The Marketers
- Six Major Marketers
- A Few Hundred Other Marketers
- Further Consolidation Is Possible
- Types of Companies Involved
- Table of Breakfast Cereal Marketers and Their Brands
- Table 4-1: Leading Breakfast Cereal Marketers and Their Brands, by Type and Target Audience, 2000 (listing): 16 marketers, 163 brands
- Marketer Shares
- Special Note about IRI Data
- In Cold Cereals, General Mills Edges Out Kellogg
- Table 4-2: Share of U.S. Retail Sales of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Marketer and Brand, 1998-2000 (percent): General Mills, Inc., Kellogg Company, Philip Morris Cos., The Quaker Oats Company, All Other Brands, Private Label; 52 brands
- Quaker Has Rock Solid Command of Hot Cereals
- Table 4-3: Share of U.S. Retail Sales of Hot Breakfast Cereals, by Marketer and Brand, 1998-2000 (percent); The Quaker Oats Company, Nabisco, Inc., Malt-O-Meal, Ralston Foods; 9 brands, All Other Brands, Private Label
- The Competitive Situation
- A Game of Intense Marketing and New Product Development
- The Price Pressure
- The Weak Alternative Scene
- Consolidation
- Competitive Profile: General Mills, Inc.
- A $6.7 Billion Company
- Six Current Business Segments
- A Pending Merger with Pillsbury
- The Right Mix of Extensions and New Brands
- General Mills' Bold Organic Move
- A Joint Venture with Nestle
- The Big G Becomes a Research Powerhouse
- Other Big G Brands
- Competitive Profile: The Hain Celestial Group, Inc
- A New Company with Net Sales of $404 Million
- Hain Celestial's Unique Stance in Multiple Retail Channels
- Other Hain Celestial Brands
- Competitive Profile: Kellogg Company
- Net Sales Revive to More Than $7 Billion
- Kellogg Trims Trade Promos, Loses Top Spot
- Kellogg's Missteps in New Product Development
- What Kellogg Intends to Do Now
- Frosted Flakes Still a Good Performer
- Kellogg's New Structure-Function Claims
- Other Kellogg Products
- Competitive Profile: Malt-O-Meal Company
- Sales of Perhaps $350 Million
- A Brief History
- A Cereal Specialist with a Value Stance
- Malt-O-Meal Still Strongest in Midwest
- Competitive Profile: The Philip Morris Companies, Inc
- Operating Revenues Estimated at $81.5 Billion in 2000
- Four Business Segments
- Keeping the Blue-Chip Post Franchise Modern
- Philip Morris' Acquisition of Nabisco Merely a Follow-Through
- Other Philip Morris Labels
- Competitive Profile: The Quaker Oats Company
- Net Sales Expected to Rebound in 2000
- Food and Gatorade Segments now Combined
- Quaker's Cholesterol-Reduction Coup
- Quaker Innovates to Create a Second Sales Wave
- PepsiCo Announces Purchase of Quaker
- A Specialty Market for Quisp
- Other Quaker Brands
- Marketing Trends
- Cross-Positioning to Multiple Audiences
- Accommodation of the Health Conscious
- Looking to Other Product Markets—and Vice Versa
- Product Trends
- Lots More of the Same
- Lots More of Healthful SKUs
- "Semi-Naturals
- Flavored Instant Hot Cereals
- Promotional/Seasonal SKUs
- Table 4-4: Selected New Product Introductions, 1998-2000 (listing): 25 marketers, 57 brands
- Consumer Advertising Expenditures
- Ad Spending at $769 Million in 1999
- Six Million-Dollar Spenders
- General Mills Spends a Colossal $357 Million
- Kellogg Trims Spending to $169 Million
- Philip Morris Allocates $138 Million
- Quaker Pumps Ad Budget to $98 Million
- Nabisco Spends $6 Million
- Malt-O-Meal Drops Media Buys to $1.3 Million
- Other Spenders
- Consumer Advertising Positioning
- Taste
- Healthfulness
- Increased Cross-Positioning Between Adult, Kid, and Family Audiences
- Nostalgia
- Resurrecting Mikey
- Energy
- Weight Loss
- The Semi-Naturals
- Product Placement in Television Shows
- Consumer Promotions
- Much Cold Cereal Is Sold "On Deal"
- A Sophisticated Array of Promotions
- Coupons
- Table 4-5: Share of Consumer Dollars Spent to Take Advantage of Marketers' or Retailers' Special Promotions, 1998 (percent): 10 products
- Marketer-Labeled Price Specials
- In-Pack Premiums
- Merchandise Offers and Tie-Ins
- Free Air Miles
- Some Use of Sweepstakes, Entertainment Tie-Ins, Celebrities
- A Bible Promotion Stopped
- American Heart Month and National School Breakfast Week
- Distribution And Retail
- Distribution
- The Classic Four-Step Path, Plus DSD
- Marketers' Category Management and ECR
- Transora.com Formed to Streamline the Packaged Foods Path
- At the Retail Level
- Supermarkets Dominate Cereal Scene
- Retail Margins Narrowing
- Table 5-1: Retailers' Average Gross Profit Margins on Breakfast Cereals, 1995-1999 (percent): cold cereals, hot cereals, grits
- Where Shelved
- Assortment
- Product Mixes: Sweetened Often Dominates
- Retailers Boutiquing Breakfast Alternatives in Cereal Aisles
- Marketers Cater to Drug Channel
- Webvan: An E-tailer Allies with Fleming and SuperValu
- Retailers Bank on Private Label
- The Consumer
- The Consumer of Cold Breakfast Cereals
- The Simmons Consumer Survey
- Almost 99 Million Purchase Cold Cereals for Their Households
- No Demographics Stand out in Overall Cold Cereal Purchase/Use
- Over Half of Users Cite Heavy Cold Cereal Consumption
- Figure 6-1: Household Level of Consumption of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, 1999 (percent): Heavy, Medium, Light
- Women Decide the Majority of Cold Cereal Purchases
- Table 6-1: Level of Household Consumption of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Gender of Decision-Maker, 1999 (number and percent): Heavy, Medium, Light
- A Family Profile for Heavy Consumers of Cold Cereals
- Table 6-2: Demographic Factors Favoring Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Number of Portions Used by Household During Previous Week (listing): Any, Heavy, Medium, Light; 12
Factors
- Regular and Sweetened Types Are Most Popular
- Table 6-3: Household Consumption of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Type of Cereal and by Gender, 1999 (number and percent): Regular, Sweetened, Natural
- Age, Occupation, Income Distinguish Cold Cereal Types
- Table 6-4: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Type, 1999 (listing): Regular, Sweetened, Natural; 12 factors
- The Sole Type User Skews Senior
- Table 6-5: Demographic Factors Favoring Sole Type Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast (listing): 12 factors
- Cheerios, Kellogg's Corn Flakes, Kellogg's Frosted Flakes Lead in Popularity
- Sole versus Primary Brand Use
- Table 6-6: Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereal Purchase, by Brand, 1999 (number and percent): 22 brands, private label, sole brand user, primary brand user
- Key Factors Marking Cold Cereal Brand Use
- Age
- Marital Status
- Children
- Education, Occupation, Income
- Table 6-7a: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Brand, 1999 (listing): Cap'n Crunch (Plain), Cheerios, Apple Cinnamon Cheerios, Frosted Cheerios; 12 factors
- Table 6-7b: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Brand, 1999 (listing): Honey Nut Cheerios, Cocoa Puffs, Golden Grahams, Kellogg's Apple Jacks; 12 factors
- Table 6-7c: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Brand, 1999 (listing): Kellogg's Corn Flakes, Kellogg's Corn Pops, Kellogg's Frosted Flakes, Kellogg's Frosted Mini Wheats ; 12 factors
- Table 6-7d: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Brand, 1999 (listing): Kellogg's Froot Loops, Kellogg's Raisin Bran, Kellogg's Rice Krispies, Kellogg's Special K; 12 factors
- Table 6-7e: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Brand, 1999 (listing): Lucky Charms, Nabisco Spoon Size Shredded Wheat, Post Grape-Nuts, Post Honeycomb; 12 factors
- Table 6-7f: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Brand, 1999 (listing): Post Raisin Bran, Wheaties, Private Label; 12 factors
Factors in Sole versus Primary Cold Cereal Brand Use
- Table 6-8: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Cold (R-T-E) Breakfast Cereals, by Sole and Primary Brand Use, 1999 (listing): Sole Brand Use, Primary Brand Use; 12 factors
- The Consumer of Hot Breakfast Cereals
- Nearly 71 Million Purchase Hot Cereals
- Older Folks, African Americans Mark Hot Cereals Use
- Heavy Use of Hot Cereals Dominates
- Table 6-9: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Hot Breakfast Cereals, 1999 (listing): 12 factors
- Figure 6-2: Household Level of Consumption of Hot Breakfast Cereals, 1999 (percent): Heavy, Medium, Light
- Table 6-10: Level of Household Consumption of Hot Breakfast Cereals, by Gender of Decision-Maker, 1999 (number and percent): All, Heavy, Medium, Light
Seniors, Low Incomes Featured in Heavy and Medium Use
- Light Users of Hot Cereals Well Educated and Prosperous
- Table 6-11: Demographic Factors Favoring Use of Hot Breakfast Cereals, by Number of Portions Used During Previous Week, 1999 (listing): Any, Heavy, Medium, Light; 12 factors
- Quaker Instant Oatmeal Is the Most Popular Hot Cereal
- Table 6-12: Hot Breakfast Cereal Purchase, by Brand, 1999 (number and percent): 7 brands
- Hot Cereal Brand Use: Older Age Groups, Family Situations, Less Affluence
- Table 6-13a: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Hot Breakfast Cereals, by Brand Used Most Often, 1999 (listing): Aunt Jemima Grits, H.O. Instant Oatmeal, Malt-O-Meal, Nabisco
Cream of Wheat; 12 factors
- Table 6-13b: Demographic Factors Favoring Household Use of Hot Breakfast Cereals, by Brand Used Most Often, 1999 (listing): Quaker Instant Oatmeal, Old Fashioned Quaker Oats, Quaker
Grits; 12 factors
Appendix I: Examples Of Consumer And Trade Advertising And Promotions
Appendix II: Addresses Of Selected Marketers
|
800.298.5294
Int'l: +1.240.747.3095
Questions?
Contact a research specialist >
Most Popular Research
Omega 3 Fatty Acids and the U.S. Food and Beverage Market
Sandwiches in the U.S.: Foodservice and Retail Market and Trends
Ethical Consumers and Corporate Responsibility: The Market and Trends for Green Products in Food and Beverage, Personal Care and Household Items
Functional, Fortified and Inherently Healthy Foods and Beverages: The U.S. Phood Market
Food Flavors and Ingredients Outlook 2007
Natural, Organic and Eco-Friendly Pet Products in the U.S., 2nd Edition
|